Re: svn commit: r346096 - head/sys/arm/conf

2019-09-03 Thread Ian Lepore
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 21:23 +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > I understand the reason for GENERIC. But are we so blind that we will > delete everything that is not GENERIC? In other words, why to delete > nice specific KERNEL configurations for boards we support when only > reason I see is that GENER

Re: svn commit: r346096 - head/sys/arm/conf

2019-09-03 Thread Emmanuel Vadot
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 03:50:45 -0700 (PDT) "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: > > > > Hi Svatopluk, > > > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:23:35 +0200 > > Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > > > > > I understand the reason for GENERIC. But are we so blind that we will > > > delete everything that is not GENERIC? In other

Re: svn commit: r346096 - head/sys/arm/conf

2019-09-03 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> > Hi Svatopluk, > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:23:35 +0200 > Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > > > I understand the reason for GENERIC. But are we so blind that we will > > delete everything that is not GENERIC? In other words, why to delete > > nice specific KERNEL configurations for boards we support w

Re: svn commit: r346096 - head/sys/arm/conf

2019-09-03 Thread Emmanuel Vadot
Hi Svatopluk, On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:23:35 +0200 Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > I understand the reason for GENERIC. But are we so blind that we will > delete everything that is not GENERIC? In other words, why to delete > nice specific KERNEL configurations for boards we support when only > reason

Re: svn commit: r346096 - head/sys/arm/conf

2019-09-03 Thread Svatopluk Kraus
I understand the reason for GENERIC. But are we so blind that we will delete everything that is not GENERIC? In other words, why to delete nice specific KERNEL configurations for boards we support when only reason I see is that GENERIC is so cool for some people? Svatopluk Kraus On Wed, Apr 10,

Re: svn commit: r346096 - head/sys/arm/conf

2019-04-15 Thread Ian Lepore
On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 21:23 +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > I understand the reason for GENERIC. But are we so blind that we will > delete everything that is not GENERIC? In other words, why to delete > nice specific KERNEL configurations for boards we support when only > reason I see is that GENER

Re: svn commit: r346096 - head/sys/arm/conf

2019-04-12 Thread Emmanuel Vadot
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 03:50:45 -0700 (PDT) "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: > > > > Hi Svatopluk, > > > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:23:35 +0200 > > Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > > > > > I understand the reason for GENERIC. But are we so blind that we will > > > delete everything that is not GENERIC? In other

Re: svn commit: r346096 - head/sys/arm/conf

2019-04-12 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> > Hi Svatopluk, > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:23:35 +0200 > Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > > > I understand the reason for GENERIC. But are we so blind that we will > > delete everything that is not GENERIC? In other words, why to delete > > nice specific KERNEL configurations for boards we support w

Re: svn commit: r346096 - head/sys/arm/conf

2019-04-12 Thread Emmanuel Vadot
Hi Svatopluk, On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:23:35 +0200 Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > I understand the reason for GENERIC. But are we so blind that we will > delete everything that is not GENERIC? In other words, why to delete > nice specific KERNEL configurations for boards we support when only > reason

Re: svn commit: r346096 - head/sys/arm/conf

2019-04-11 Thread Svatopluk Kraus
I understand the reason for GENERIC. But are we so blind that we will delete everything that is not GENERIC? In other words, why to delete nice specific KERNEL configurations for boards we support when only reason I see is that GENERIC is so cool for some people? Svatopluk Kraus On Wed, Apr 10,