On 2 July 2017 at 14:00, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> + } else if (strnEQ(s, "diff --git a/", 13)) {
> + /* Git-style diffs. */
> + piece_of_git = 1;
This is incomplete and leaves to confusing behavior for some git
diffs. In particular with '
On 7/3/2017 2:14 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 01:35:25PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 7/3/2017 1:17 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:42:15AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 07/02/17 21:53, Conrad Meyer wrote:
Does this change the behavior of 'pa
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 01:35:25PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> On 7/3/2017 1:17 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:42:15AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> >> On 07/02/17 21:53, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> >>> Does this change the behavior of 'patch -p1' (for example) with 'git
> >
On 7/3/2017 1:17 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:42:15AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 07/02/17 21:53, Conrad Meyer wrote:
Does this change the behavior of 'patch -p1' (for example) with 'git
diff' generated diffs? So patches that could be applied with -p1
before now
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:42:15AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> On 07/02/17 21:53, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> > Does this change the behavior of 'patch -p1' (for example) with 'git
> > diff' generated diffs? So patches that could be applied with -p1
> > before now need to be applied with -p0? Or is t
Hello;
On 07/02/17 21:53, Conrad Meyer wrote:
Hi Pedro,
Does this change the behavior of 'patch -p1' (for example) with 'git
diff' generated diffs? So patches that could be applied with -p1
before now need to be applied with -p0? Or is this a different mode
of patch?
Thanks for pointing thi
Hi Pedro,
Does this change the behavior of 'patch -p1' (for example) with 'git
diff' generated diffs? So patches that could be applied with -p1
before now need to be applied with -p0? Or is this a different mode
of patch?
If so, that's a somewhat surprising change in behavior. Does GNU
patch h