Re: svn commit: r268173 - head/sys/conf

2014-07-03 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 07/03/14 12:52, Marius Strobl wrote: On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:30:46PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 07/02/14 13:28, Marius Strobl wrote: On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:04:48PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: It worked at least on my Ultra 5 -- though probably because the ATI Mach64 FCode

Re: svn commit: r268173 - head/sys/conf

2014-07-03 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:30:46PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > On 07/02/14 13:28, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:04:48PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >> It worked at least on my Ultra 5 -- though probably because the ATI > >> Mach64 FCode ROM there is substantially

Re: svn commit: r268173 - head/sys/conf

2014-07-02 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 07/02/14 13:28, Marius Strobl wrote: On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:04:48PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: It worked at least on my Ultra 5 -- though probably because the ATI Mach64 FCode ROM there is substantially shared with the Mac version. It was even reasonably fast. But regardless of wheth

Re: svn commit: r268173 - head/sys/conf

2014-07-02 Thread Marius Strobl
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:04:48PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > It worked at least on my Ultra 5 -- though probably because the ATI > Mach64 FCode ROM there is substantially shared with the Mac version. It > was even reasonably fast. But regardless of whether it's a generally > useful consol

Re: svn commit: r268173 - head/sys/conf

2014-07-02 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
It worked at least on my Ultra 5 -- though probably because the ATI Mach64 FCode ROM there is substantially shared with the Mac version. It was even reasonably fast. But regardless of whether it's a generally useful console driver on SPARC, at least it proves that vt(4) works fine. -Nathan On