It worked at least on my Ultra 5 -- though probably because the ATI Mach64 FCode ROM there is substantially shared with the Mac version. It was even reasonably fast. But regardless of whether it's a generally useful console driver on SPARC, at least it proves that vt(4) works fine.
-Nathan

On 07/02/14 12:46, Marius Strobl wrote:
Author: marius
Date: Wed Jul  2 19:46:42 2014
New Revision: 268173
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268173

Log:
   Remove ofwfb(4) in order to fix the LINT build breakage caused by r268069.
   Both vt(4) and ofwfb(4) need a lot of love to be usable on sparc64 and even
   then the performance of ofwfb(4) would suck compared to hardware accelerated
   drivers like creator(4) and machfb(4).

Modified:
   head/sys/conf/files.sparc64

Modified: head/sys/conf/files.sparc64
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/conf/files.sparc64 Wed Jul  2 19:31:49 2014        (r268172)
+++ head/sys/conf/files.sparc64 Wed Jul  2 19:46:42 2014        (r268173)
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ dev/syscons/scterm-teken.c    optional        sc
  dev/syscons/scvtb.c           optional        sc
  dev/uart/uart_cpu_sparc64.c   optional        uart
  dev/uart/uart_kbd_sun.c               optional        uart sc | vt
-dev/vt/hw/ofwfb/ofwfb.c                optional        vt
  kern/kern_clocksource.c               standard
  kern/subr_dummy_vdso_tc.c     standard
  kern/syscalls.c                       optional        ktr


_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to