Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-27 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:17:04PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > It's not difficult to add -- the issue is that the mechanism is unreliable. > > It doesn't work for all partition types supporting labels, it's hard to > > figure out what the name of the label provider is in a generic way, and the

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-26 Thread Warner Losh
On Apr 26, 2011, at 9:00 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 04/26/11 18:48, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >> >> On 26/04/2011, at 1:31, Warner Losh wrote: This is why I prefer IDs since they are nominally unique (UFS ones, GPTs damn well better be :) Although I concede it is rather a

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-26 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 04/26/11 18:48, Daniel O'Connor wrote: On 26/04/2011, at 1:31, Warner Losh wrote: This is why I prefer IDs since they are nominally unique (UFS ones, GPTs damn well better be :) Although I concede it is rather annoying to work out which is which, or type them out manually.. For things lik

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-26 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 26/04/2011, at 1:31, Warner Losh wrote: >> This is why I prefer IDs since they are nominally unique (UFS ones, GPTs >> damn well better be :) >> >> Although I concede it is rather annoying to work out which is which, or type >> them out manually.. > > For things like ZFS, UUIDs aren't so ba

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-25 Thread Warner Losh
On Apr 25, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 25/04/2011, at 6:55, Warner Losh wrote: >>> The best way is to change to use GPT IDs (/dev/gptid/xxx) if you are on a >>> GPT system) or UFS IDs (/dev/ufsid/xxx) if you can't. >> >> I've been running with ufs labels for a couple of ye

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 25/04/2011, at 6:55, Warner Losh wrote: >> The best way is to change to use GPT IDs (/dev/gptid/xxx) if you are on a >> GPT system) or UFS IDs (/dev/ufsid/xxx) if you can't. > > I've been running with ufs labels for a couple of years now, since the first > rumblings of this hit the streets.

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Warner Losh
On Apr 24, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 24/04/2011, at 18:19, Andrey Chernov wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:23:08AM +, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> ATA device names in /etc/fstab or other places, make sure to update >>> them respectively (adX -> adaY, acdX ->

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Dan Mack
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 05:25:00AM -0500, Dan Mack wrote: For those of us using a ZFS root pool built out of /dev/gpt/ devices, will these automagically pick up the new names? Even if you use adX devices in your ZFS pool and they will suddenly c

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 24/04/2011, at 18:19, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:23:08AM +, Alexander Motin wrote: >> ATA device names in /etc/fstab or other places, make sure to update >> them respectively (adX -> adaY, acdX -> cdY, afdX -> daY, astX -> saY, >> -where 'Y's are the se

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Alexander Motin
On 24.04.2011 19:19, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:23:08AM +, Alexander Motin wrote: ATA device names in /etc/fstab or other places, make sure to update them respectively (adX -> adaY, acdX -> cdY, afdX -> daY, astX -> saY, - where 'Y's are the s

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:23:08AM +, Alexander Motin wrote: > ATA device names in /etc/fstab or other places, make sure to update > them respectively (adX -> adaY, acdX -> cdY, afdX -> daY, astX -> saY, > - where 'Y's are the sequential numbers for each type in order of > -

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 04/24/11 05:49, Robert Watson wrote: On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Alexander Best wrote: == --- head/UPDATING Sun Apr 24 08:58:58 2011 (r220982) +++ head/UPDATING Sun Apr 24 09:23:08 2011 (r220983) @@ -28,8 +28,9 @@ NOTE TO

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 05:25:00AM -0500, Dan Mack wrote: > For those of us using a ZFS root pool built out of /dev/gpt/ > devices, will these automagically pick up the new names? Even if you use adX devices in your ZFS pool and they will suddenly change to adaY, ZFS should detect this properly an

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Alexander Motin
On 24.04.2011 13:25, Dan Mack wrote: On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Alexander Best wrote: On Sun Apr 24 11, Alexander Motin wrote: Author: mav Date: Sun Apr 24 09:23:08 2011 New Revision: 220983 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220983 Log: Explicitly note that device numbers are starting from

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Alexander Best wrote: == --- head/UPDATING Sun Apr 24 08:58:58 2011(r220982) +++ head/UPDATING Sun Apr 24 09:23:08 2011(r220983) @@ -28,8 +28,9 @@ NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THIN

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Dan Mack
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Alexander Best wrote: On Sun Apr 24 11, Alexander Motin wrote: Author: mav Date: Sun Apr 24 09:23:08 2011 New Revision: 220983 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220983 Log: Explicitly note that device numbers are starting from zero. Modified: head/UPDATING M

Re: svn commit: r220983 - head

2011-04-24 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Apr 24 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > Author: mav > Date: Sun Apr 24 09:23:08 2011 > New Revision: 220983 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220983 > > Log: > Explicitly note that device numbers are starting from zero. > > Modified: > head/UPDATING > > Modified: head/UPDATING