On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Warner Losh wrote:
On Oct 22, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
...
BTW, besides bde's technical points, your change made
our sources different from OpenBSD, NetBSD, and new
project openlibm. Diffing against the other trees
would become cluttered.
BDE's technical poin
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Warner Losh wrote:
On Oct 22, 2012, at 5:14 AM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Warner Losh wrote:
Feel free to fix them however. I added the comments because the algorithms
weren't quite the same... If you have a better way, feel free to back my stuff
out on
On Oct 22, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 06:59:04AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2012, at 10:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:08:49PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
Feel free to fix them however. I added the comments bec
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 06:59:04AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Oct 21, 2012, at 10:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:08:49PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> Feel free to fix them however. I added the comments because
> >> the algorithms weren't quite the same... If
On Oct 22, 2012, at 5:14 AM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>> Feel free to fix them however. I added the comments because the algorithms
>> weren't quite the same... If you have a better way, feel free to back my
>> stuff out on the way to it.
>
> But the al
On Oct 21, 2012, at 10:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:08:49PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>> Feel free to fix them however. I added the comments because
>> the algorithms weren't quite the same... If you have a better
>> way, feel free to back my stuff out on the way to it
On Oct 21, 2012, at 10:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:08:49PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>> Feel free to fix them however. I added the comments because
>> the algorithms weren't quite the same... If you have a better
>> way, feel free to back my stuff out on the way to it
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Warner Losh wrote:
Feel free to fix them however. I added the comments because the algorithms
weren't quite the same... If you have a better way, feel free to back my stuff
out on the way to it.
But the algorithms are identical to a fault. Inside the functions, all
li
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:08:49PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> Feel free to fix them however. I added the comments because
> the algorithms weren't quite the same... If you have a better
> way, feel free to back my stuff out on the way to it.
>
> Warner
>
Please back your commits out.
Two of
Feel free to fix them however. I added the comments because the algorithms
weren't quite the same... If you have a better way, feel free to back my stuff
out on the way to it.
Warner
On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:43 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> Docu
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Warner Losh wrote:
Log:
Document the methods used to compute logf. Taken and edited from the
double version, with adaptations for the differences between it and
the float version.
Please back this out.
This was intentionally le
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Warner Losh wrote:
Log:
Document the methods used to compute logf. Taken and edited from the
double version, with adaptations for the differences between it and
the float version.
Please back this out.
This was intentionally left out. It is painful to maintain large
c
Author: imp
Date: Fri Oct 19 22:46:48 2012
New Revision: 241755
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241755
Log:
Document the methods used to compute logf. Taken and edited from the
double version, with adaptations for the differences between it and
the float version.
Modified:
head
13 matches
Mail list logo
