-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/11 10:00 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:16:47PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:43:12 pm Ken Smith wrote:
>>> If you're referring to the FTP directory tree layout we wind up
>>> with:
>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:16:47PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:43:12 pm Ken Smith wrote:
> > If you're referring to the FTP directory tree layout we wind up with:
> >
> > .../releases/amd64/9.0-RELEASE
> > .../releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.0
> >
> > for an
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:16 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:43:12 pm Ken Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:41 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:11:36 am Ken Smith wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokucha
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:43:12 pm Ken Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:41 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:11:36 am Ken Smith wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:43:12PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:41 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:11:36 am Ken Smith wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:41 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:11:36 am Ken Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> > > > This is the problem we are trying to "solve":
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:11:36 am Ken Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> > > This is the problem we are trying to "solve":
> > >
> > > Supported TARGET/TARGET_ARCH pairs for world and k
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> > This is the problem we are trying to "solve":
> >
> > Supported TARGET/TARGET_ARCH pairs for world and kernel targets
> > amd64/amd64
> > arm/arm
> > arm/armeb
>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> This is the problem we are trying to "solve":
>
> Supported TARGET/TARGET_ARCH pairs for world and kernel targets
> amd64/amd64
> arm/arm
> arm/armeb
> i386/i386
> ia64/ia64
> mips/mipsel
> mips/mipseb
> m
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:34 +, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:31, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"?
> >>>
> >>> Can't we use one if they are equal?
> >>
> >> I'd prefer consistency. [...]
> >
> > But it looks so plai
On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:31, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"?
>>>
>>> Can't we use one if they are equal?
>>
>> I'd prefer consistency. [...]
>
> But it looks so plain stupid!
I've had someone ask me what amd64-amd64 meant when I pointed t
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:03:40AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 13:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> > > Or both? We're heading in the direction of having both for the FTP
> > > server tree.
> > >
> > > Kinda g
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 13:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:17 -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> > > On 11/16/11 08:28, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro wrote:
> > > > In article<20151849.pafinr3k012...@svn.freebsd.or
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:17 -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> > On 11/16/11 08:28, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro wrote:
> > > In article<20151849.pafinr3k012...@svn.freebsd.org>
> > > Nathan Whitehorn writes:
> > >
> > >> Log:
> > >>Further
In article <1321457050.78238.10.ca...@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu>
Ken Smith writes:
>> >> +: ${RELSTRING=`chroot $2 uname -s`-`chroot $2 uname -r`-`chroot $2 uname
>> >> -p`}
>> > Should this be 'uname -m' rather than 'uname -p'?
>>
>> There isn't a good option here when there is only one tag -- mos
On 11/16/11 08:28, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro wrote:
In article<20151849.pafinr3k012...@svn.freebsd.org>
Nathan Whitehorn writes:
Log:
Further automate production release generation by naming files the right
things and generating checksums.
Modified: head/release/generate-release.sh
==
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:17 -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 11/16/11 08:28, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro wrote:
> > In article<20151849.pafinr3k012...@svn.freebsd.org>
> > Nathan Whitehorn writes:
> >
> >> Log:
> >>Further automate production release generation by naming files the right
> >>
In article <20151849.pafinr3k012...@svn.freebsd.org>
Nathan Whitehorn writes:
> Log:
> Further automate production release generation by naming files the right
> things and generating checksums.
>
> Modified: head/release/generate-release.sh
>
Author: nwhitehorn
Date: Tue Nov 15 18:49:27 2011
New Revision: 227536
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227536
Log:
Further automate production release generation by naming files the right
things and generating checksums.
MFC after:1 week
Modified:
head/release/generate-r
19 matches
Mail list logo
