On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:03:40AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 13:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > > > Or both? We're heading in the direction of having both for the FTP > > > server tree. > > > > > > Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"? > > > > Can't we use one if they are equal? > > I'd prefer consistency. [...]
But it looks so plain stupid! > I picture a higher percentage of people being confused about why some > architectures have one name while other architectures have two versus > people being confused about all of them having two names. And people would have to believe that we as a Project are so dumb that we could not figure out how to avoid this trivial redundancy when it is clearly not anywhere being useful. :-( ./danfe _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
