Bruce Evans writes:
> "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" writes:
> > BTW, there are numerous style issues in sbin/reboot/reboot.c.
> Really? According to knfom, it is 94.772% knf (up from 94.520% in
> ~5.2 and 92.896% in Lite2). It is a small program so it is easy to
> get right, but anything above 90% is a
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, [utf-8] Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Bruce Evans writes:
Actually, it is OK to use it in FreeBSD iff the system supports the
same program having different names, like reboot/halt/etc.
I don't see the point - you would still need different usage messages
for each version.
Bruce Evans writes:
> Actually, it is OK to use it in FreeBSD iff the system supports the
> same program having different names, like reboot/halt/etc.
I don't see the point - you would still need different usage messages
for each version. Using your example:
% reboot -h
reboot: illegal option -
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Xin LI wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Xin LI wrote:
Log:
Use getprogname() instead of referencing __progname.
Neither is permitted in FreeBSD in usage().
I didn't see references about this? If this is discouraged, perhaps we
should mention it in styl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Bruce,
Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Xin LI wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> Use getprogname() instead of referencing __progname.
>
> Neither is permitted in FreeBSD in usage().
I didn't see references about this? If this is discouraged, perha
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Xin LI wrote:
Log:
Use getprogname() instead of referencing __progname.
Neither is permitted in FreeBSD in usage().
Modified:
head/usr.bin/usbhidctl/usbhid.c
This was obtained from NetBSD, which requires using getprogname() in
usage().
Bruce
Author: delphij
Date: Tue Jun 23 23:16:00 2009
New Revision: 194789
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/194789
Log:
Use getprogname() instead of referencing __progname.
Modified:
head/usr.bin/usbhidctl/usbhid.c
Modified: head/usr.bin/usbhidctl/usbhid.c
