[A bit delayed]
On 2012-Nov-15 02:41:22 -0600, "Matthew D. Fuller"
wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:07:27PM +1100 I heard the voice of
>Bruce Evans, and lo! it spake thus:
>>
>> Maybe malloc() would be faster with MALLOC_PRODUCTION. I use
>> /etc/malloc.conf -> aj locally. freefall doesn't
I aim to import bmake-20121109 soon (once I sort out svn 1.7.7 bug),
will loook at this as well.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:27:49 +, Chris Rees writes:
>> > I was kicking the tires on this and noticed bmake is dynamically linked.
>> >
>> > Can you change it to being statically linked?
___
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:07:27PM +1100 I heard the voice of
Bruce Evans, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Maybe malloc() would be faster with MALLOC_PRODUCTION. I use
> /etc/malloc.conf -> aj locally. freefall doesn't have
> /etc/malloc.conf. MALLOC_OPTIONS no longer works, and MALLOC_CONF
> is too
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Chris Rees wrote:
On 14 Nov 2012 18:49, "Konstantin Belousov" wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:28:23AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:18:06PM +, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
Log:
Merge bmake-20121010
Hi Simon,
I was kicking the tires on this
On 14 Nov 2012 18:49, "Konstantin Belousov" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:28:23AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:18:06PM +, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> > > Log:
> > > Merge bmake-20121010
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> > I was kicking the tires on this and noticed bmak
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:28:23AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:18:06PM +, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> > Log:
> > Merge bmake-20121010
>
> Hi Simon,
> I was kicking the tires on this and noticed bmake is dynamically linked.
>
> Can you change it to being statically
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:18:06PM +, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> Log:
> Merge bmake-20121010
Hi Simon,
I was kicking the tires on this and noticed bmake is dynamically linked.
Can you change it to being statically linked?
This issue most recently came up in freebsd-current. See thread pie
