On 14 Nov 2012 18:49, "Konstantin Belousov" <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:28:23AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:18:06PM +0000, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > > Log: > > > Merge bmake-20121010 > > > > Hi Simon, > > I was kicking the tires on this and noticed bmake is dynamically linked. > > > > Can you change it to being statically linked? > > > > > > This issue most recently came up in freebsd-current. See thread pieces > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033460.html > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033472.html > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033473.html > > As you see, I prefer to not introduce new statically linked binaries into base. > If, for unfortunate turns of events, bmake is changed to be statically linked, > please obey WITH_SHARED_TOOLCHAIN.
Or a /rescue/bmake for when speed is a concern would also be acceptable. Chris _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
