-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:55:00 -0700 (MST)
"M. Warner Losh" mentioned:
> In message: <496fc32f.3040...@freebsd.org>
> Maxim Sobolev writes:
> : Christoph Mallon wrote:
> : > Alexey Dokuchaev schrieb:
> : >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:05:27
In message: <496fc32f.3040...@freebsd.org>
Maxim Sobolev writes:
: Christoph Mallon wrote:
: > Alexey Dokuchaev schrieb:
: >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:05:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: >>> In message: <20090115020752.52566769.s...@freebsd.org>
: >>> Stanislav Sedov
Christoph Mallon wrote:
Alexey Dokuchaev schrieb:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:05:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <20090115020752.52566769.s...@freebsd.org>
Stanislav Sedov writes:
: > +shift = 8 * (reg & 3);
: > : : Would it make sense to replace this with
: >
Alexey Dokuchaev schrieb:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:05:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <20090115020752.52566769.s...@freebsd.org>
Stanislav Sedov writes:
: > +shift = 8 * (reg & 3);
: >
:
: Would it make sense to replace this with
: > +
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:05:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20090115020752.52566769.s...@freebsd.org>
> Stanislav Sedov writes:
> : > + shift = 8 * (reg & 3);
> : >
> :
> : Would it make sense to replace this with
> : > + shift = (reg & 3) << 3;
>
In message: <20090115020752.52566769.s...@freebsd.org>
Stanislav Sedov writes:
: > + shift = 8 * (reg & 3);
: >
:
: Would it make sense to replace this with
: > + shift = (reg & 3) << 3;
:
: to not rely on possible compiler optimizations?
I don't think that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:32:43 + (UTC)
Oleksandr Tymoshenko mentioned:
> Author: gonzo
> Date: Wed Jan 14 22:32:43 2009
> New Revision: 187251
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/187251
>
> Log:
> o Simplify code: trade 15 lines of case
