On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:05:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20090115020752.52566769.s...@freebsd.org> > Stanislav Sedov <s...@freebsd.org> writes: > : > + shift = 8 * (reg & 3); > : > > : > : Would it make sense to replace this with > : > + shift = (reg & 3) << 3; > : > : to not rely on possible compiler optimizations? > > I don't think that it matters all that much these days...
But the name "shift" kinda suggests << instead of *, no? ./danfe _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
