On 12/12/17 20:27, Cy Schubert wrote:
PR 224080???
Yes please.
Regards
--
Niclas
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
: Warner Losh
Cc: Antoine Brodin; svn-src-h...@freebsd.org; svn-src-all@freebsd.org;
src-committers
Subject: Re: svn commit: r326792 - head/stand/uboot/common
How about you both close one PR as a punishment and we pretend this did
not happen.
The thing to do was to reply to the offending
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> How about you both close one PR as a punishment and we pretend this did
> not happen.
>
I'll fix 6 CIDs as punishment.
Warner
> The thing to do was to reply to the offending commit or contact the
> committer
> on irc. Only in case of no
How about you both close one PR as a punishment and we pretend this did
not happen.
The thing to do was to reply to the offending commit or contact the
committer
on irc. Only in case of no timely response fixing on your own is the right
thing
to do.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Warner Losh
The email I wrote here also sucks. It was unduly harsh. While the commit
message should have been better, I was too harsh in trying to express this
and giving a better example.
Warner
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> This commit message sucks. Please use a more descriptive
This commit message sucks. Please use a more descriptive one in the future
like "catch up to change rX that remove the argument from interact." If
you want to be snarky, add 'pounty hat to imp' to it. Thats infornative.
Your message is utterly useless. It doesn't even say what arch is broken.
