e, 22 Hester Road
London SW11 4AN
T +44 (0)20 7943 6191
E probin...@fosterandpartners.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20161101/86bacc3b/attachm
On 10/31/2016 12:07 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:40:50PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
Also, I think things get even funnier when you consider you don't
have three pairs of omnis, for a differential receiver along each
spatial axis, but rather a tetrahedron of omnis,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:13:22PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> >>You could make six dipoles, one along each edge.
> >
> >But with 4 inputs you can have only 4 independent signals.
>
> Yeah, they are not linearly independent. I wonder how to map them...
> was thinking you could derive those
Sebastià V. Amengual wrote:
I could be wrong, but as I understand, as far as the distance between
the microphones is much smaller than
the wavelength, it is possible to obtain first-order microphones with
any kind of directional pattern. Thus,
at least for a limited frequency range they could c
Dave Hunt:
THe Harman mems microphones presumably depend on their size, and
shape, to make them directional. They are not "two omnis and some
DSP" but "utilize an acoustical design to achieve directionality".
4mm wide is not too large, 22mm a bit more problematic. There seem to
be some ot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mu8U7gYCGmw&list=LL45t78-1NUPa8SiAjf6hluw&index=3
Seems to confirm some of my speculations.
"We can go up from 3 mems up to 30 or 40 mems." (1.55)
Best,
Stefan
P.S.: "For cameras"
Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Dave Hunt:
THe Harman mems microphones presumably
