Yep, that’s a bigger ship alright. There looks to be a pretty good mounting
point on the bow, in which case my major concern would be structure/cable-borne
vibration. I’ve recorded on a couple of large vessels, especially to capture
the throbbing drone that they make: handheld works well to all
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 01/06/2016 06:36 PM, Courville, Daniel wrote:
« Sennheiser realizes that content is king and that for any new
technology to gain traction, it must be easy to develop in.
Sennheiser is therefore looking to help content creators take
advantage of their 3D audio platf
(Sorry, 2nd posting should look better...)
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 01/06/2016 06:36 PM, Courville, Daniel wrote:
« Sennheiser realizes that content is king and that for any new
technology to gain traction, it must be easy to develop in.
Sennheiser is therefore looking to help content cre
http://www.blueripplesound.com/hrtf-amber
The IRCAM AKG "Listen" HRTF data contains measured HRTFs from about 50
different people - this must have taken a lot of effort and we're very
grateful to the good folk of IRCAM for doing the work and making the
results available to the world! What we'v
er HRTF itself is derived from IRCAM AKG "Listen" HRTF data, a public
> available list. And even IRCAM should be interested to provide a good
> universal HRTF based on its own and public HRTF research!)
> ___
> Sursound
data, a public
>> available list. And even IRCAM should be interested to provide a good
>> universal HRTF based on its own and public HRTF research!)
>> ___
>> Sursound mailing list
>> Sursound@music.vt.edu
>> https
llyWirasnik.com <http://BillyWirasnik.com>*
845-417-8290
------ next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160124/4c5e036b/attachment.html>
__
The LISTEN set from IRCAM, the KEMAR set from MIT and the spherical set
by R. Duda are included in the Ambisonic Toolkit. I use them on
http://ambisonic.xyz/ . The spherical set is probably a good enough
compromise for VR applications, because perfection is not required for a
good experience. What
Augustine Leudar wrote:
In reply to your original question - I believe there are available data
sets for Kemar head measurements - not quite what you asking for but it is
supposed to be an "average" head
http://sound.media.mit.edu/resources/KEMAR.html
I was aware of the fact that dummy head
Marc Lavallée wrote:
The LISTEN set from IRCAM, the KEMAR set from MIT and the spherical set
by R. Duda are included in the Ambisonic Toolkit. I use them on
http://ambisonic.xyz/ . The spherical set is probably a good enough
compromise for VR applications, because perfection is not required for
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:00:37 +,
Stefan Schreiber wrote :
> Should we "normalize" anthropometric data or (measured) HRTF data
> sets?
That would discriminate potential users at the sides of the normal
curve...
There could be a way to find a "best match" from sets of measured
heads, maybe usi
Le Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:35:03 -0500,I wrote:
> There could be a way to find a "best match" from sets of measured
> heads, maybe using 3D scanning, or with simple measurements. For
> example, the spherical HRTF model have different diameters, which is a
> good start.
>
> There's a paper on "Rapid Ge
Marc Lavallée wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:00:37 +,
Stefan Schreiber wrote :
Should we "normalize" anthropometric data or (measured) HRTF data
sets?
That would discriminate potential users at the sides of the normal
curve...
There could be a way to find a "best match" from set
You are right, the SOFA effort is important.
Here I see that many more data sets are available now:
http://www.sofaconventions.org/mediawiki/index.php/Files
I suspect that there will be many different solutions based of
the available sets.
I don't think there could be a "universal" or optimal HR
Marc Lavallée wrote:
The LISTEN set from IRCAM, the KEMAR set from MIT and the spherical set
by R. Duda are included in the Ambisonic Toolkit. I use them on
http://ambisonic.xyz/ . The spherical set is probably a good enough
compromise for VR applications, because perfection is not required for
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 23:57:37 +,
Stefan Schreiber wrote :
> Marc, just some idea:
>
> If the ATK includes different HRTF sets, doesn't it already provide
> an open interface/standard for exchangeable HRTF data?
ATK provides HRTF data as wav files, ready to be used with
convolvers. It a "read
Marc Lavallée wrote:
Formats like 5.1 to 22.2 are application specific, so I think they
should not be part of a standard.
No, but any 5.1 to binaural decoder (application, as you say) would have
to use some HRTF data brought into some specific shape/format. You would
have to match loudspea
As far as I know the Kemar head is the average human head shape taken from
thousands of measurments - http://kemar.us/ Im not quite sure why an HRTF
from a Kemar head would be less desirable than averaging of 50 seperate
head measurements in real human head. I dont know how well Kemar averages
th
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 01:04:30 +,
Stefan Schreiber wrote :
> >ATK provides HRTF data as wav files, ready to be used with
> >convolvers. It a "ready to use" application specific format.
> >
> In which (angular) resolution, etc.? Azimuth/elevation resolution?
The wav files are impulse response f
19 matches
Mail list logo
