Marc Lavallée wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:00:37 +0000,
Stefan Schreiber <st...@mail.telepac.pt> wrote :
Should we "normalize" anthropometric data or (measured) HRTF data
sets?
That would discriminate potential users at the sides of the normal
curve...
There could be a way to find a "best match" from sets of measured
heads, maybe using 3D scanning, or with simple measurements. For
example, the spherical HRTF model have different diameters, which is a
good start.
Yes, I wrote about this.
Actually several times, and quite some time before "Oculus Audio".
(s. http://www.vrvis.at/projects/locaphoto, an "older" but ongoing
project which I had mentioned.)
But please, let's not mix up things again.
The thread subject is clear enough! What happens if you can't
personalise HRTF data, which is (from any practical point of view) still
the standard case?
(So, just some suggestion: Combine a "good universal HRTF data set" with
the possibility to load another < closely matched > or even <
personalised > HRTF set, maybe in the AES-69 format. If you provide such
a solution you will be future-proof. I hope this makes some sense... ;-) )
Best,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
