On 09/16/2014 12:15 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
One vocal proponent of Auro 3D as a classical recording format
insists that a huge square of omnis is the only acceptable miking
technique. No comment.
That should have read "cube" rather than square, of course. Apologies.
The only thing you can
man/private/sursound/attachments/20140916/d4347151/attachment.html>
>> ___
>> Sursound mailing list
>> Sursound@music.vt.edu
>> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
>> account or options
I'll be interested to hear about your progress.
In the back of my garage, I have a zero-latency 8-way 1st order encode-decode
device (it even has a 4-way 1st order feed for subs). It's wholly analogue, and
we used it in Ambisonix Dance nights in the 90's. The 4 outputs of an analogue
desk passe
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 01:07:37PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> Exactly. One microphone per speaker, plus spots as necessary.
>
> >As does e.g. 22.2. At least 5.1 had *some* paradigm behind it, or
> >could pretend to have one. That can't be said of any of the 'umpteen
> >speakers' formats.
