Not arguing with the figures, just stating empirical findings.
Will see if I can find details of the two machines at some point. Ditched one
manufacturer because of poor quality control, so may just have been unlucky.
John
Sent from my iPad
> On 5 Nov 2013, at 22:41, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>
I found this website comparing signal to noise on a lot of recording devices:
http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm
Seems they have at least used the same equipment to measure all the devices.
- Bosse
-Original Message-
From: Sursound [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf O
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:09:26PM +, Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote:
>
> I found this website comparing signal to noise on a lot of recording devices:
> http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm
> Seems they have at least used the same equipment to measure all the devices.
Interesting. And it confirm
sound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131106/860cf652/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Speaking of CDs, does anyone know of a player which can playback the 4-channel
12-bit specification from the Red Book?
> On Nov 6, 2013, at 11:00 AM, sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote:
>
> to
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://
On 2013-11-05, Eero Aro wrote:
The previous posters already said it all.
Actually, not all of it. Evenif I drafted a way to find it all, I
*anything* but sure it would work out in the end.
I can only add that it is almost impossible to find out from an
acoustic Soundfield or other micropho
