Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Matthew Palmer
Has anyone tried a system that was using the Z506 model for Logitech? -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131020/4bbdc1bd/attachment.h

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Andrew Castiglione
group Subject: Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers Has anyone tried a system that was using the Z506 model for Logitech? -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131020/4bb dc

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Marc Lavallée
[Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers > > Has anyone tried a system that was using the Z506 model for Logitech? > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attach

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Bearcat M . Şándor
; > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers > > > > Has anyone tried a system that was using the Z506 model for Logitech? > > -- next part -- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: > > < > https://mai

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Charlie Richmond
hat said, the Logitech self powered systems are generally extremely well made and sound very good, imho. C-) -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131020/73b9a2d1/attachment.htm

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Matthew Palmer
> periphonic installation, along with 4 to 8 small sub-woofers for a > > supplemental horizontal or periphonic low frequency decoder. > > > > Agreed. That said, the Logitech self powered systems are generally > extremely well made and sound very good, i

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Matthew Palmer
peakers, all matched, should be >> > preferred. >> > >> > I would only such use small multimedia speakers for a very compact >> > periphonic installation, along with 4 to 8 small sub-woofers for a >> > supplemental horizontal or periphonic low frequency decoder. >>

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Matthew Palmer
axial speakers, all matched, should be >>> > preferred. >>> > >>> > I would only such use small multimedia speakers for a very compact >>> > periphonic installation, along with 4 to 8 small sub-woofers for a >>> > supplemental horizontal or peri

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Charlie Richmond
xt part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131020/d93da2fc/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Marc Lavallée
ct > > > periphonic installation, along with 4 to 8 small sub-woofers for a > > > supplemental horizontal or periphonic low frequency decoder. > > > > > > > Agreed. That said, the Logitech self powered systems are generally > > extremely well made and sound v

Re: [Sursound] Very inexpensive surround speakers

2013-10-20 Thread Matthew Palmer
gt; preferred. > > > > > > > > I would only such use small multimedia speakers for a very compact > > > > periphonic installation, along with 4 to 8 small sub-woofers for a > > > > supplemental horizontal or periphonic low frequency decoder. > > &g