tion
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130714/29aced06/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.mu
sic.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130714/29aced06/attachment.html>
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
___
es toy from Father Christmas this might be an interesting
> > option
> > -- next part --
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130714/29aced06/attachment.html
> >
> >
Christmas this might be an
> > > interesting option
> > > -- next part --
> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > URL: <
> > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/pr
--On 14 July 2013 13:02 -0400 Marc Lavallée wrote:
- Only two channels for the interchangeable microphones?
(then no possibility for a FOA interchangeable microphone)
Well, it could be done with fly-leads to two of the fixed-socket channels,
a bit hacky, but no very big deal.
Paul
--
Pa
Augustine Leudar wrote:
Of course the preamps might need a bit of hacking - I wonder how it will
compare to the tascam dr680.
Its level controls seem to be analog and can't be easily ganged. So for use
with TetraMic you'd have to somehow lock the levels down for the four
channels, send them
One big screwup on the ST350 and 450 from Soundfield is the lack of a tone
generator which is the same at each output. Would make things much easier.
I asked Soundfield for it after I bought the ST350, and they hummed and
hahhed and the did nothing about it. Not that I was surprised, given how
gla
