Eero Aro wrote:
> Dave Malham wrote:
>> the Ambisonic demo bug was striking even then...
>
> Yes, I noticed that too.
>
> Makes me wonder if the reason for the slow adaptation of
> Ambisonics have just been unlucky demonstrations?
>
> :-)
Instead, it made me think that first-order
Ambisonics (par
at this post submitted by the
*off-the-cuff* Eric)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130626/535efc06/attachment.html>
___
Sursound
Eric Carmichel wrote:
...
>> Two-channel playback (both convention and binaural) is here to stay for a
>> while, so optimizing Ambisonics for stereo is desirable to me. In fact, one
>> of my favorite recordings from the late 80s was made with the band (The
>> Cowboy Junkies) circled around a Cal
our experiences were.
> Many thanks for your time.
> Best,
> Eric C. (the C continues to remind readers that this post submitted by the
> *off-the-cuff* Eric)
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/
separate and forward omni mic), I'd be interested in knowing
>what your experiences were.
>Many thanks for your time.
>Best,
>Eric C. (the C continues to remind readers that this post submitted by the
>*off-the-cuff* Eric)
>-- next part --
>An HTML atta
