Eero Aro wrote: > Dave Malham wrote: >> the Ambisonic demo bug was striking even then... > > Yes, I noticed that too. > > Makes me wonder if the reason for the slow adaptation of > Ambisonics have just been unlucky demonstrations? > > :-)
Instead, it made me think that first-order Ambisonics (particularly with four speakers) is on the border of stability. In one sense this is an indication of its merit. It is very difficult to screw up a demonstration of 5.1, but then how do you screw up something that is already broken? Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
