__
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/**mailman/listinfo/sursound<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound>
>
--
07580951119
augustine.leudar.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
t; Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > https://mail.music.vt.edu/**mailman/listinfo/sursound<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> 07580951119
>
> augustine.leudar.com
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbe
The Price for the Tascam is OK in USA/NY (599 USD + tax) but in Europe - No -
around 1200 USD.
Do you know of anybody who would want to buy a MOTU Traveler Mk3 for a
reasonable price, from my point of view :-)
- Bo-Erik
-Original Message-
From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailt
Another possibility would be buying an Edirol R44. I am using it with a
TetraMic. But I am not sure if the preamps of the Tascam are better? I am a
little unhappy with the noise of the Edirol.
Am 03.10.2012 um 15:42 schrieb Bo-Erik Sandholm:
> The Price for the Tascam is OK in USA/NY (599 USD
- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20121003/b2a838f7/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
ontroller does this automatically,
> and a MIDI track on a DAW can be used to track the changes. Just passing
> this along for other researchers...
> Disclaimer: Suggestions, questions, and ideas presented herein are in no
> way a reflection of my cat, who is far wiser than yours tru
I'll use this as a shameless excuse to reference my paper "Using a Non-Standard
Audio Toolkit to Produce Standard Spatial Audio Mixes" found online (scribd.com
is one place). It uses Reaper (can handle up to 64 channels of audio per bus)
and WigWare and is for first timers or those who want ambi
;misses" in a row
> means increase the SNR). The software controller does this automatically,
> and a MIDI track on a DAW can be used to track the changes. Just passing
> this along for other researchers...
> Disclaimer: Suggestions, questions, and ideas presented herein are in
On 2012-10-03, Eric Carmichel wrote:
In nearly all Ambisonic setups, the listener's head lies on a line
connecting two or more speakers.
The classical regular pantophonic decoders make no such assumption, and
work just fine. For your purposes, of the five Platonic solids
unfortunately the on
On 2012-10-03, Eric Carmichel wrote:
At least I got as far as 2*pi radians / 5 = 105 degrees.
To add, you can find the classical first order decoding equations for
regular polygonal layouts in either the BLaH series of papers, or
Gerzon's originals. They're all present in the Motherlode, wit
On 3 October 2012 20:39, Andrew Horsburgh wrote:
>
> Michael's right, AFAIK, that there hasn't been much modern use of beyond 5
> speaker arrangements. I can't think of examples where an odd number of
> speakers has been used with ambisonic that wasn't to the ITU 775 standard
> shape. Perhaps
Anyone know/have any experience of http://www.cmorrow.com/true3D.html?
Dave
--
As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from the University, so this
disclaimer is redundant
These are my own views and may or may not be shared by my employer
Dave Malham
Ex-Music Research Centre
Department
> On 3 October 2012 20:39, Andrew Horsburgh
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Michael's right, AFAIK, that there hasn't been much modern use of beyond
>> 5 speaker arrangements. I can't think of examples where an odd number of
>> speakers has been used with ambisonic that wasn't to the ITU 775
>> standard shape. P
13 matches
Mail list logo
