lt;https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120327/b309a671/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
s scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120327/b309a671/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/l
Or four Sounddevices 788T's? they lock together just fine, apparently.
96k only though
Why on earth would one want anything higher than (or even as high as) 96k?
Chris Woolf
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu
On 03/25/2012 09:14 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote:
Thanks all - am alo considering the M-audio lightbridge (£298) (heard bard
reports) and the Presonus Firestudio *Lightpipe* (£468) - both of which
have 32 channel adat and then using behringer DA converters (4 * £100 =
£400) - anyone any experience
2; format=flowed
>
> On 27/03/2012 4:01 AM, Michael McCrea wrote:
> > In terms of stability of the cards, you really get what you pay for.
> RME,
> > for example, has been superb for years?though at a price.
>
> +1 for RME HDSPe MADI
>
>
> -
At 17:32 27/03/2012, Augustine Leudar wrote:
>actually I was considering the RME HDSPe RayDAT which is actually the
>same price as the lightpipe but I would have to use a desktop and I want
>to use a fast laptop with a ssd drive (thus the need for firewire)
Firewire is on the way out. Few la
...or you could wait for people to start making Thunderbird-enabled audio
interfaces? They'd be plenty fast, though you'd be back to buying apple...
On Mar 27, 2012, at 8:09 PM, David Pickett wrote:
> At 17:32 27/03/2012, Augustine Leudar wrote:
>
> >actually I was considering the RME HDSPe
