I still want to suggest a setup that I will soon have in operation, I have
written about it before.
It uses 10 channels, it is a hexagon in the horizontal plane with a speakers at
front back.
The Z is handled by for speakers, placed where the 4 hexagon side speakers will
end up if the
Hexago
On 05/03/2011 08:03 AM, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
Similarly, what does a SoundField mic output? A/B format. Now
translate that into 5.1. That's what's a realistic production flow.
and it does not work very well. nobody who is producing 5.1 the usual
way (i.e. without using a soundfield) will
Quick suggestion: - as you're having to use more than 8 channels anyway, you're
likely to be using a 16 channel card; thus, you would have some channels left
to decode (horizontal only) to 3 or 4 subs
Dr Peter Lennox
School of Technology
University of Derby, UK
tel: 01332 593155
e: p.len...@der
On 03/05/2011 09:18, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
..
but if you want to bring ambisonics into the industry, it's either HOA
or go into a quiet corner to die. the argument that any talk of HOA will
be detrimental to ambisonics uptake is sentimental BS. HOA is no black
magic, and six speakers aren't
uite detail instruction to configure the parameters
in Audio Analyzer for measuring frequency response?
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Junfeng
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/2
Yes, I have a few woofers available BUT according to what I understand
from psychoacoustics we cannot really hear directions of sound below 80 Hz,
as the ear/brain is changing method of decoding soundwaves between 80 to 100 Hz?
So do I really need more than a pair driven in mono (or 4) to even ou
>From
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_localization#Evaluation_for_low_frequencies
Evaluation for low frequencies
For frequencies below 800 Hz, the dimensions of the head (ear distance 21.5 cm,
corresponding to an interaural time delay of 625 µs), are smaller than the half
wavelength of the
> from psychoacoustics we cannot really hear directions of sound below 80 Hz
I know that it is frequently written, but it's not true. Of the two
localization
mechanisms active at low frequencies, Interaural Time Differences (ITDs) are
the
ones that give useable localization cues in free space.
very briefly, I think decorrelated Lfgives better 'spaciousness', and highly
correlated Lf (as obtained by feeding 'W' to subs) causes the opposite - that
lack of externalisation or 'in the head' feeling
Dr Peter Lennox
School of Technology,
Faculty of Arts, Design and Technology
University of D
When I first met Neville Thiele, well over 10 years ago now, he told me that
one of the things he wanted to do more research in was how to reproduce LF
properly in rooms so that it had the directionally we normally hear.
So it would seem that at least he never believed that mono was enough below
I totally agree that more than 1 but probably not more than 4 subwoofers are
an noticable advantage in a room for below 100Hz or infrasound
Frequencies.
What i am wondering/thinking of is really if our hearing do not use the clues
of the overtones or distorsion overtones from subwoofer elements
I would think that a lot of these tests assume that we hear only with the ears.
But when it comes to LF, the entire body is sensitive to it. That changes the
entire issue about head-size vs. wave-length, etc. At certain volumes LF is
like touch, not like sound.
Ronald
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
