ards
ppl
Dr Peter Lennox
School of Technology,
Faculty of Arts, Design and Technology
University of Derby, UK
e: p.len...@derby.ac.uk
t: 01332 593155
From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf
Of Eric Carmichel [e...@elcaudio.com]
Sent: 25 February 2
round Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Saga of the Subs
>
> ELC: Visual cues may play part in this ability, too, but I fully agree
> with you: The sound-source direction is unambiguous in certain situations.
> This is why I wish to include multiple subs in my forthcoming experi
.
Thanks for corrections, but please also consider viewing the above two links--I
need to re-read them myself.
Best,
Eric
From: Robert Greene
To: Eric Carmichel ; Surround Sound discussion group
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Sursoun
Dont pay any attention to this about intensity and the
Doppler shift for moving objects, would be my
suggestion. It is almost all
wrong. ELC is mistaken here.
See my public post please.
Robert
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, etienne deleflie wrote:
ELC: Visual cues may play part in this ability, to
This is wrong about the Doppler effect and perception of distance.
It would be correct if the object moving and emitting sound
as it moved were coming straight towards you and going through
you and then moving away. But a police car with a siren say
is not aiming straight at you(or at least you b
>
> ELC: Visual cues may play part in this ability, too, but I fully agree
> with you: The sound-source direction is unambiguous in certain situations.
> This is why I wish to include multiple subs in my forthcoming experiments.
> Another common myth is how much the Doppler Effect plays in our perc
