Re: [Sursound] remarks on "with-height" wfs

2012-12-10 Thread Peter Lennox
December 2012 23:04 To: Surround Sound discussion group Subject: Re: [Sursound] remarks on "with-height" wfs more effective proximity Another question is why you would use WFS for the horizontal part at all. > Does it offer anything you need and that HOA can't do ? > > Ciao, >

Re: [Sursound] remarks on "with-height" wfs

2012-12-08 Thread Augustine Leudar
*ducks for cover* On 8 December 2012 23:04, Augustine Leudar wrote: > more effective proximity > > > Another question is why you would use WFS for the horizontal part at all. > > >> Does it offer anything you need and that HOA can't do ? >> >> Ciao, >> >> -- >> FA >> >> A world of exhaustive, rel

Re: [Sursound] remarks on "with-height" wfs

2012-12-08 Thread Augustine Leudar
more effective proximity Another question is why you would use WFS for the horizontal part at all. > Does it offer anything you need and that HOA can't do ? > > Ciao, > > -- > FA > > A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. > It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion,

Re: [Sursound] remarks on "with-height" wfs

2012-12-08 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 08:39:58PM +, Augustine Leudar wrote: > someone was telling me 3d wfs is theoretically possible but would be > computationally very very expensive. The only issue I would have with > combining WFS synthesis and say ambisonics or vbap for height is that I > dont have tim

Re: [Sursound] remarks on "with-height" wfs

2012-12-08 Thread Augustine Leudar
someone was telling me 3d wfs is theoretically possible but would be computationally very very expensive. The only issue I would have with combining WFS synthesis and say ambisonics or vbap for height is that I dont have time or knowledge to write such a program (unless somebody invented a wavefiel

Re: [Sursound] remarks on "with-height" wfs

2012-12-08 Thread Augustine Leudar
On 8 December 2012 12:56, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > On 12/08/2012 12:46 AM, Augustine Leudar wrote: > >> yes Matts uses Vbap between two arrays for height - but only works on >> windows thus far >> > > unless i'm misunderstanding something, that remark doesn't make sense. > vbap is amplitude

[Sursound] remarks on "with-height" wfs

2012-12-08 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 12/08/2012 12:46 AM, Augustine Leudar wrote: yes Matts uses Vbap between two arrays for height - but only works on windows thus far unless i'm misunderstanding something, that remark doesn't make sense. vbap is amplitude panning between n-tuplets of speakers (usually for 1<=n<=3, unless