Re: [Sursound] Submersed in Subs (and ideas) (Eric Carmichel)

2013-03-02 Thread Steven Boardman
Hi Eric C, and all of sursound! This is my first post after lurking for quite some time, so I hope I have done it correctly. This is a fantastic resource that I always look forward to digesting! I stumbled upon ambisonics about 2 years ago, after being very disappointed by 5.1 variants, and

Re: [Sursound] Submersed in Subs (and ideas)

2013-02-23 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 02/23/2013 05:45 AM, Eric Carmichel wrote: But because the transition frequency is 700 Hz for conventional Ambisonic decoders and 400 Hz for domestic decoders (thanks, Martin, for this info), it seems plausible to make this the electronic crossover point as well. not if you wish to employ c

Re: [Sursound] Submersed in Subs (and ideas)

2013-02-23 Thread JBAgmail
On 2013-02-22, at 9:45 PM, Eric Carmichel wrote: > On a wholly different note: Next week I’ll be making an Ambisonic recording > in the Superstition Mountain Range, located in Arizona. In the mornings, > there’s a low-pitched steam whistle that blows from some type of facility > west of the mo

[Sursound] Submersed in Subs (and ideas)

2013-02-22 Thread Eric Carmichel
Greetings to Everyone, I received some great input and ideas related to my last two post (bi-amping the B-format and subwoofers). Everyone’s input was greatly appreciated. It wasn’t all too long ago that I first learned of Ambisonics, and then this group. At the very start, there was a comment st