Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-24 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42:21PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > many thanks for this link, very very useful indeed. it should be > noted, though, that this text describes a theoretical, best > practises guideline for the audio industry. many very widely > distributed music surround producti

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-24 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 02/24/2013 07:25 PM, diatonis wrote: Message: 1 Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 06:14:12 +0100 From: J?rn Nettingsmeier Subject: Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post To: Eric Carmichel , Surround Sound discussion group Recommendations For Surround Sound Production http

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-24 Thread Eric Benjamin
On 02/22/2013 03:25 AM, Eric Carmichel wrote: >> I’ll confess ignorance when it comes to knowledge of a separate or >> unique physiological mechanism used to localize (or omni-ize) >> ultra-low frequencies. Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > same here. if there is indeed a special mechanism at work, i

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-24 Thread diatonis
> Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 06:14:12 +0100 > From: J?rn Nettingsmeier > Subject: Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post > To: Eric Carmichel , Surround Sound discussion > group Recommendations For Surround Sound Production http://www.gram

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-23 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 02/22/2013 03:25 AM, Eric Carmichel wrote: Regarding localization, home theatre sound and the 80-Hz xover point: I’ll confess ignorance when it comes to knowledge of a separate or unique physiological mechanism used to localize (or omni-ize) ultra-low frequencies. same here. if there is in

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-22 Thread Dave Malham
On 22 February 2013 02:25, Eric Carmichel wrote: Oops forgot to add the comment below to my last post; > I suppose there’s no reason to worry about inter-channel timing issues when > using dissimilar components (meaning a MOTU optically linked to an D-A > device). Similar to the MOTU interface,

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-22 Thread Dave Malham
On 22 February 2013 02:25, Eric Carmichel wrote: > Within the context of room reflections, music listening, > home theatre, and the like, I’m fully aware that frequencies below 80 Hz > are near impossible to localize. Add to the overall auditory scene the > constituent frequencies that provide un

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-22 Thread Bo-Erik Sandholm
recent ffado driver. Regards Bo-Erik -Original Message- From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Chapman Sent: den 22 februari 2013 09:11 To: Eric Carmichel; Surround Sound discussion group Subject: Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-22 Thread Michael Chapman
> Jörn brought into the discussion not only filter type and slope, but the > choice of audio interfaces. I have first-generation MOTU 896HD units. > Although there are two FireWire ports on each unit's backside, MOTU states > that the only two units can be synchronized using a FireWire (daisy chai

[Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-21 Thread Eric Carmichel
Greetings to All, First, many thanks to Jörn, Bo-Erik, and Michael for your responses to my recent post. Your responses gave me food for thought, and I’d like to add a few comments regarding audio interfaces, psychoacoustics, and pseudo second-order miking (I’m confused in this latter area). B