achments/20130222/87fb5234/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Didn't get chance to reply earlier.
About 12 years ago, I set up a system with 32 speakers on a hemisphere, 1st and
2nd order material
with 8x subs, 1st order horizontal only , low pass 90 Hz
I excluded height for Lf simply because of the logistics of flying bins, but
also as elevation cues ar
On 22 February 2013 02:25, Eric Carmichel wrote:
Oops forgot to add the comment below to my last post;
> I suppose there’s no reason to worry about inter-channel timing issues when
> using dissimilar components (meaning a MOTU optically linked to an D-A
> device). Similar to the MOTU interface,
On 22 February 2013 02:25, Eric Carmichel wrote:
> Within the context of room reflections, music listening,
> home theatre, and the like, I’m fully aware that frequencies below 80 Hz
> are near impossible to localize. Add to the overall auditory scene the
> constituent frequencies that provide un
http://www.reaper.fm/ for Windows or MacOs osX
low cost or 60 days evaluation. I recommend it.
A multi channel DAW for multi channel playback/Recording or editing in
combination with a MOTU traveler and a AD8000, I have that combination.
Even linux can nowadays recognize the MOTU device with r
On 21 February 2013 20:47, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:13:54PM -0700, Martin Leese wrote:
>
>> If you have four subs then you might want to
>> consider arranging them in a tetrahedron.
>> Note that subs are heavy, so there is a
>> practical problem with mounting them up in
> Jörn brought into the discussion not only filter type and slope, but the
> choice of audio interfaces. I have first-generation MOTU 896HD units.
> Although there are two FireWire ports on each unit's backside, MOTU states
> that the only two units can be synchronized using a FireWire (daisy chai
