On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 02:01:50PM -0500, David Pickett wrote:
> At 04:39 09/10/2011, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:16:22AM +0100, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone know, of the top of their heads,
> >> if a film set type clapper board reliably provides a pos
On 10/09/2011 09:01 PM, David Pickett wrote:
At 04:39 09/10/2011, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:16:22AM +0100, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
>> Does anyone know, of the top of their heads,
>> if a film set type clapper board reliably provides a positive going
>> leading e
At 04:39 09/10/2011, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:16:22AM +0100, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know, of the top of their heads,
>> if a film set type clapper board reliably provides a positive going
>> leading edge to it's impulse? I can't see it not, but I'd
At 04:16 09/10/2011, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
Does anyone know, of the top of their heads, if a film set type
clapper board reliably provides a positive going leading edge to
it's impulse? I can't see it not, but I'd prefer that to be
confirmed by repeatable experiments.
It surely has t
Daniel Courville wrote:
I think we should try to establish some sort of "official" database of
what SoundField (and TetraMic) models are polarity inverting at the
B-Format output.
Using the original cylindrical PPA, TetraMic's A-format outputs were
inverting.
Using the current PPA2, its A-f
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:16:22AM +0100, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
> Does anyone know, of the top of their heads,
> if a film set type clapper board reliably provides a positive going
> leading edge to it's impulse? I can't see it not, but I'd prefer that to
> be confirmed by repeatable ex
Second cup of coffee has now penetrated and I realise I forgot about the
stereo - still, essentially the same, except we say that it's non-inverting
if a due front pressure increase produces a positive signal in both
channels.
Dave
On Oct 9 2011, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi folks,
A wet Sunday morning and I haven't been up that long (only on first cup
of coffee) so I hope this will make sense!
Surely all that is actually needed, at least as far as B format is
concerned, is whether the W signal goes positive for a pressure increase?
Everything else is given
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 08:24:02AM -, Michael Chapman wrote:
>
>> for TetraProc:
>> -it allows inversion, or not, at the user's choice
>> (it actually allows it on a per channel (per mic capsule) basis
>> -it also allows ... to complicate your task ... 'Endfire'
>
> Not really exact.
>
> Tetr
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 08:24:02AM -, Michael Chapman wrote:
> for TetraProc:
> -it allows inversion, or not, at the user's choice
> (it actually allows it on a per channel (per mic capsule) basis
> -it also allows ... to complicate your task ... 'Endfire'
Not really exact.
Tetraproc allows
> Le 11-10-07 17:40, Sampo Syreeni a �crit :
>
>>On 2011-09-30, Daniel Courville wrote:
>>
>>>I think we should try to establish some sort of "official" database of
>>>what SoundField (and TetraMic) models are polarity inverting at the
>>>B-Format output.
>>
>>In that case we first need a datal mod
11 matches
Mail list logo
