Actually, the butterfly flap thing is not really good either.
In chaos, things do not cause other things. The system is
essentially noncausal.
This is a trick point. But if a system depends unstably
on its initial state, it makes no real sense to say that it
depends on its initial state at all in
Helmut Oellers wrote:
> 2011/4/26 Dave Malham
>> On 24/04/2011 19:11, Helmut Oellers wrote:
>>>...modern computers are also clever. Today nothing is unaccountable if we
>>> know the formula and all variables.
>>
>> That's a BIG assumption - and given the essentially chaotic (in the
>> mat
On 2011-04-28, Helmut Wittek wrote:
it's no easy task to evaluate distance perception under anechoic
conditions (which obviously hardly exists).
By the way, I think that is one of the reasons anechoic rooms are
perceptually so overwhelming and induce the kind of anxiety they do: in
the absen
Hello Junfeng,
it's no easy task to evaluate distance perception under anechoic conditions
(which obviously hardly exists).
We did this during my PhD research on WFS.
Have a look at our paper:
Wittek, H., Kerber, S., Rumsey, F. and Theile, G.
Spatial perception in Wave Field Synthesis rendered s
at the universe is
> nondeterministic.
>
> Robert
>
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL
The deterministic universe idea departed from serious science
almost 100 years ago since qunatum mechanics is by nature
nondeterministic. (More precisely, 80 some years ago if you want to wait
for people to have realized exactly how intrinsic the nondeterminacy
was--Heisenberg formulated his
interest, I can describing the main principle
as short as possible in a next mail.
Regards, Helmut
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110428/60be7d3c/attachment.html>
_
