Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics in the Telegraph newspaper

2010-12-16 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 12/17/2010 12:00 AM, Martin Leese wrote: > Hi, > > Fell across a couple of online stories in the > Telegraph newspaper: > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/8204573/Radio-could-go-3D-but-the-internet-is-the-most-important-dimension.html > and: > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/82045

[Sursound] Ambisonics in the Telegraph newspaper

2010-12-16 Thread Martin Leese
Hi, Fell across a couple of online stories in the Telegraph newspaper: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/8204573/Radio-could-go-3D-but-the-internet-is-the-most-important-dimension.html and: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/8204505/BBC-working-on-3D-radio.html Regards, Martin -- Martin

Re: [Sursound] scaling it up - ambisonics with line arrays

2010-12-16 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 12/16/2010 06:23 PM, Alex wrote: > Dear Jörn and Sascha, > > @ Jörn: If you really have to time to play around a bit, you could > assemble the individual boxes of your 8 line arrays (should be around 60 > or 70 in sum?) to set up a circular array and this way test at least an > approximation o

Re: [Sursound] scaling it up - ambisonics with line arrays

2010-12-16 Thread Alex
tarbeiter/alexander_lindau/ +++*/ -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20101216/fc31e916/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu h

Re: [Sursound] scaling it up - ambisonics with line arrays

2010-12-16 Thread Charlie Richmond
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: i need to get a windows box anyway, so i'll have a look at SSR asap... And you could also plug in our dongle and check out SoundMan-Server ;-) Enjoy! Charlie | - Charlie Richmond - Richmond Sound Design - Skype: charlierichmond - | | - http://ww

Re: [Sursound] scaling it up - ambisonics with line arrays

2010-12-16 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 12/16/2010 01:48 PM, sascha.sp...@telekom.de wrote: >> i need to get a windows box anyway, so i'll have a look at SSR >> asap... sounds like it allows for easy A/B comparison between the >> different rendering methods? > > It currenly runs only under Linux. /me punishes self with a very larg

Re: [Sursound] scaling it up - ambisonics with line arrays

2010-12-16 Thread Sascha.Spors
> > Dear Jörn, > > > > did you consider using Wave Field Synthesis? WFS has no > problems with > > irregular setups, as far as no large gaps (due to doors > etc.) are in > > the array. And it fully supports model-based rendering, which means > > that you can easily generate loudspeaker feeds

Re: [Sursound] scaling it up - ambisonics with line arrays

2010-12-16 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
hi sascha! On 12/16/2010 01:27 PM, sascha.sp...@telekom.de wrote: > Dear Jörn, > > did you consider using Wave Field Synthesis? WFS has no problems with > irregular setups, as far as no large gaps (due to doors etc.) are in > the array. And it fully supports model-based rendering, which means > t

Re: [Sursound] scaling it up - ambisonics with line arrays

2010-12-16 Thread Sascha.Spors
Dear Jörn, did you consider using Wave Field Synthesis? WFS has no problems with irregular setups, as far as no large gaps (due to doors etc.) are in the array. And it fully supports model-based rendering, which means that you can easily generate loudspeaker feeds for virtual sources at arbitra