Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

2021-11-01 Thread Rick Macklem
Miroslav Lachman wrote: [good stuff snipped] > Apple sources can be found there > https://opensource.apple.com/source/smb/ with all the history from SMBv1 > to SMBv3. The files have original copyright header from 2001 Boris Popov > (same as FreeBSD) but otherwise it is very different code due to >

Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

2022-01-09 Thread Rick Macklem
I am going to look at the OpenSolaris code, to see if I think it will be an easier port. rick From: Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 5:47 PM To: Rick Macklem; freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable Cc: Yuri Sub

Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

2022-01-19 Thread Rick Macklem
rick From: Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 10:27 AM To: Rick Macklem; freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable Cc: Yuri Subject: Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Un

Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

2022-01-19 Thread Rick Macklem
Yuri wrote: > Rick Macklem wrote: > > I have downloaded the final version of the opensolaris > > smbfs and it looks much more reasonable to port to > > FreeBSD. > > What do you mean by "final version of the opensolaris smbfs", the one > from 2010? Pleas

Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14

2022-01-22 Thread Rick Macklem
Mark Saad wrote: [stuff snipped] > So I am looking at the Apple and Solaris code, provided by rick. I am not > sure if the illumos code provides SMB2 support. They based the solaris > code on Apple SMB-217.x which is from OSX 10.4 . Which I am sure > predates smb2 . > > https://github.com/apple-os

Re: nfsd becomes slow when machine CPU usage is at or over 100% on STABLE/13

2022-03-09 Thread Rick Macklem
Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > Hi, > > I'm on stable/13 with latest code base. > I started testing pre-13.1 branch. > > I noticed major performance degrades with NFS when all CPUs are fully > utilized. > > This happends with stable/13 but not releng/13.0 nor releng/12.3. NFS performance is sensitive to R

Re: nfsd becomes slow when machine CPU usage is at or over 100% on STABLE/13

2022-03-20 Thread Rick Macklem
mike tancsa wrote: > On 3/20/2022 7:43 AM, mike tancsa wrote: >> On 3/18/2022 9:18 PM, Yoshihiro Ota wrote: >>> I had built several versions between releng/13.0 branch point to >>> stable/13 (before releng/13.1 was created) and all of them had such >> performance degrade. >>> >>> I started suspect

Re: nfsd becomes slow when machine CPU usage is at or over 100% on STABLE/13

2022-03-27 Thread Rick Macklem
into it. rick I added "enable DDB" to i386 kernel but didn't touch amd64 kernel. Both amd64 and i386 looks okay with releng/13.1. Hiro On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 20:45:30 + Rick Macklem wrote: > mike tancsa wrote: > > On 3/20/2022 7:43 AM, mike tancsa wrote: > >>

Re: nfs client's OpenOwner count increases without bounds

2022-05-04 Thread Rick Macklem
Alan Somers wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 13 (tested on both 13.0-RELEASE and 13.1-RC5) desktop > mounting /usr/home over NFS 4.2 from an 13.0-RELEASE server. It > worked fine until a few weeks ago. Now, the desktop's performance > slowly degrades. It becomes less and less responsive until I restar

Re: nfs client's OpenOwner count increases without bounds

2022-05-04 Thread Rick Macklem
Alan Somers wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:23 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > Alan Somers wrote: > > > I have a FreeBSD 13 (tested on both 13.0-RELEASE and 13.1-RC5) desktop > > > mounting /usr/home over NFS 4.2 from an 13.0-RELEASE server. It > > &g

Re: nfs client's OpenOwner count increases without bounds

2022-05-05 Thread Rick Macklem
Alan Somers wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 6:56 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > Alan Somers wrote: > > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:23 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > > > > > Alan Somers wrote: > > > > > I have a FreeBSD 13 (teste

Re: nfs client's OpenOwner count increases without bounds

2022-05-05 Thread Rick Macklem
Alan Somers wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 8:49 AM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > Alan Somers wrote: > > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 6:56 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > > > > > Alan Somers wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:23

Re: nfs stalls client: nfsrv_cache_session: no session

2022-07-16 Thread Rick Macklem
Peter wrote: > Hija, > I have a problem with NFSv4: > > The configuration: > Server Rel. 13.1-RC2 > nfs_server_enable="YES" > nfs_server_flags="-u -t --minthreads 2 --maxthreads 20 -h ..." Allowing it to go down to 2 threads is very low. I've never even tried to run a server with less t

Re: nfs stalls client: nfsrv_cache_session: no session

2022-07-16 Thread Rick Macklem
Peter wrote: > Hija, > I have a problem with NFSv4: > > The configuration: > Server Rel. 13.1-RC2 > nfs_server_enable="YES" > nfs_server_flags="-u -t --minthreads 2 --maxthreads 20 -h ..." > mountd_enable="YES" > mountd_flags="-S -p 803 -h ..." > rpc_lockd_enable="YES" >

Re: NFS issue - newnfs_request: Wrong session srvslot=1 slot=0, freeing free slot!!

2022-08-25 Thread Rick Macklem
Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote: > Hi, > > We are having trouble with NFS running on STABLE: > > Aug 26 02:21:42 iron2 kernel: newnfs_request: Wrong session srvslot=1 slot=0 > Aug 26 02:21:42 iron2 kernel: freeing free slot!! > Aug 26 02:21:43 iron2 kernel: newnfs_request: Wrong session srvslot=1 slot

Re: NFS issue - newnfs_request: Wrong session srvslot=1 slot=0, freeing free slot!!

2022-08-25 Thread Rick Macklem
Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote: > Rick, > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:18 AM Rick Macklem > > >mailto:rmack...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Ganbold Tsagaankhuu mailto:ganb...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We are having trouble with NFS running

Re: NFS issue - newnfs_request: Wrong session srvslot=1 slot=0, freeing free slot!!

2022-08-26 Thread Rick Macklem
Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote: > > Rick, > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:18 AM Rick Macklem > > > >mailto:rmack...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Ganbold Tsagaankhuu mailto:ganb...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We are having

Re: double used hostuuids - Re: NFS issue - newnfs_request: Wrong session srvslot=1 slot=0, freeing free slot!!

2022-08-27 Thread Rick Macklem
Ronald Klop wrote: >On 8/27/22 00:17, Rick Macklem wrote: >> Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote: >>>> Rick, >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:18 AM Rick Macklem > >>>> >mailto:rmack...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: >> Ganbold Tsagaa

Re: double used hostuuids - Re: NFS issue - newnfs_request: Wrong session srvslot=1 slot=0, freeing free slot!!

2022-08-28 Thread Rick Macklem
Ronald Klop wrote: > Van: Pete French > Datum: 28 augustus 2022 10:16 > Aan: stable@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: Re: double used hostuuids - Re: NFS issue - newnfs_request: Wrong > session srvslot=1 slot=0, freeing free slot!! > > On 27/08/2022 16:18, Rick Macklem wrote: &

Re: nfs stalls client: nfsrv_cache_session: no session

2022-08-28 Thread Rick Macklem
Also, if you have multiple clients, make sure that they all have unique /etc/hostid's. A duplicate machine with the same /etc/hostid as another one will screw up NFSv4 really badly. rick From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org on behalf of Peter Sent: Sa

Re: Kernel DHCP unpredictable/fails (PXE boot), userspace DHCP works just fine

2023-03-16 Thread Rick Macklem
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 1:44 PM Attila Nagy wrote: > > Hi, > > As this is super annoying, I'm willing to pay a $500 bounty for solving this > issue (whomever is first, however I don't anticipate a big competition :) > Having an invoice would be best, but I'm willing to accept individuals as > w

Sorry, I broke the build for stable/13

2023-05-19 Thread Rick Macklem
Oops, an MFC I did to-day broke the build for stable/13. I have reverted the commits, so I think things should be ok now. My mistake was to assume that a change in a .h file within a #ifdef _KERNEL would not affect a userland build. (It turns out that code in libprocstat defines _KERNEL.) I'll wo

Re: Sorry to mail you directly with a NFS question...

2023-05-26 Thread Rick Macklem
I am reposting this to the mailing list, as permitted by Terry Kennedy, since others might be able to provide useful input and the discussion gets archived. rick On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 4:34 PM Terry Kennedy wrote: > > On 2023-05-26 18:47, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Btw, in general it

Re: Sorry to mail you directly with a NFS question...

2023-05-29 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 5:27 PM Terry Kennedy wrote: > > > I have gathered the data requested and I'm attaching it to > > this message instead of inlining it, so only those people who > > want to look at it will see it. > >So much for that idea... I was expecting the former mailman > behavio

Re: Sorry to mail you directly with a NFS question...

2023-05-29 Thread Rick Macklem
Since the reply ended up at the end of the long email, I'll post it here as well. On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 5:55 PM Terry Kennedy wrote: > >[This is the first time I'm trying to use the new FreeBSD > list serer, and it is behaving really bizarrely - it stripped > out the attachment in my first

Re: Did something change with ZFS and vnode caching?

2023-09-01 Thread Rick Macklem
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 12:05 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > Any suggestions on what we should monitor or try to adjust? I remember you mentioning that you tried increasing kern.maxvnodes but I was wondering if you've tried bumping it way up (like 10X what it currently is)? You coul

Re: NFS exports of ZFS snapshots broken

2023-11-17 Thread Rick Macklem
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 7:10 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > Looks like main still has this problem. I exported a ZFS file system from > > a 15-current system to the same 13.2 client, and it exhibits the problem > > (EIO from NFSv3). So the problem is most likely in 14.0 as well. > >

Re: RELENG_13 kernel breakage

2024-01-03 Thread Rick Macklem
Pointy hat goes on me. This should be fixed now, rick On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 5:56 AM Helge Oldach wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > mike tancsa wrote on Wed, 03 Jan 2024 14:47:31 +0100 (CET): > > Hi, > > > > Both my i386 and amd64 kernels wont build this AM. It seems to be > > due to > > > > https://

Re: mounting NFS share from the jail

2024-01-20 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 6:48 AM Marek Zarychta wrote: > > Dear List, > > there were some efforts to allow running nfsd(8) inside the jail, but is > mounting an NFS share from the jail allowed? Inside the jail > "security.jail.mount_allowed" is set to 1, I also added "add path net > unhide" to the

Re: mounting NFS share from the jail

2024-01-20 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:55 AM Charles Sprickman wrote: > > > > > On Jan 20, 2024, at 10:09 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 6:48 AM Marek Zarychta > > wrote: > >> > >> Dear List, > >> > >> the

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-02-28 Thread Rick Macklem
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:30 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > > Hi, all, > > We've had some complaints of NFS hanging at unpredictable intervals. > Our NFS servers are running a 13-stable from last December, and > tonight I sat in front of the monitor watching `nfsstat -dW`. I was > able to clearly se

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-02-28 Thread Rick Macklem
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:30 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > > Hi, all, > > We've had some complaints of NFS hanging at unpredictable intervals. > Our NFS servers are running a 13-stable from last December, and > tonight I sat in front of the monitor watching `nfsstat -dW`. I was > able to clearly se

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-02-29 Thread Rick Macklem
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 4:04 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:30 PM Garrett Wollman > wrote: > > > > Hi, all, > > > > We've had some complaints of NFS hanging at unpredictable intervals. > > Our NFS servers are running a 13-stable

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-01 Thread Rick Macklem
a thought in the morning > > Regards, > Ronald. > > Van: Rick Macklem > Datum: 1 maart 2024 00:31 > Aan: Garrett Wollman > CC: stable@freebsd.org, rmack...@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: Re: 13-stable NFS server hang > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 4:04PM Rick Mackle

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-02 Thread Rick Macklem
ls to > ith...@uoguelph.ca. > > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 06:23:56AM -0800, Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:00 AM Ronald Klop wrote: > > > > > > Interesting read. > > > > > > Would it be possible to separate locking for admin ac

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-02 Thread Rick Macklem
ls to > ith...@uoguelph.ca. > > > On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 05:40:08AM -0800, Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:51 PM Konstantin Belousov > > wrote: > > > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. > > &

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-03 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 9:25 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < > > I believe this explains why vn_copy_file_range sometimes takes much > > longer than a second: our servers often have lots of data waiting to > > be written to disk, and if the file being copied was recently modified > > (and so is dir

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-03 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 8:28 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > > > I wrote previously: > > PIDTID COMMTDNAME KSTACK > > 997 108481 nfsdnfsd: mastermi_switch > > sleepq_timedwait _sleep nfsv4_lock nfsrvd_dorpc nfssvc_program > > svc_run_internal s

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-03 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 1:17 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 8:28 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > > > > > > I wrote previously: > > > PIDTID COMMTDNAME KSTACK > > > 997 108481 nfsdnfsd: maste

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-03 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 3:27 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 1:17 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 8:28 PM Garrett Wollman > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I wrote previously: > > > > PIDTID CO

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-03 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 4:28 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 3:27 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 1:17 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 8:28 PM Garrett Wollman > > > wrot

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-05 Thread Rick Macklem
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 2:13 AM Ronald Klop wrote: > > > Van: Rick Macklem > Datum: vrijdag, 1 maart 2024 15:23 > Aan: Ronald Klop > CC: Garrett Wollman , stable@freebsd.org, > rmack...@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: Re: 13-stable NFS server hang > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-05 Thread Rick Macklem
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:34 AM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 2:13 AM Ronald Klop wrote: > > > > > > Van: Rick Macklem > > Datum: vrijdag, 1 maart 2024 15:23 > > Aan: Ronald Klop > > CC: Garrett Wollman , stable@freebsd.org, >

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-08 Thread Rick Macklem
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 3:46 AM Ronald Klop wrote: > > > Van: Rick Macklem > Datum: dinsdag, 5 maart 2024 15:43 > Aan: Ronald Klop > CC: rmack...@freebsd.org, Garrett Wollman , > stable@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: Re: 13-stable NFS server hang > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2024

Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-03-08 Thread Rick Macklem
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 7:59 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < > > I believe this explains why vn_copy_file_range sometimes takes much > > longer than a second: our servers often have lots of data waiting to > > be written to disk, and if the file being copied was recently modified > > (and so is dir

Warning: do not enable NFSv4 delegations for a 13.3 NFS server

2024-05-07 Thread Rick Macklem
Hi, I boned up and, when wireshark reported that a NFSv4 packet was incorrectly constructed, I changed the NFSv4 code the "fix" the problem. I found out recently (at a IETF NFSv4 testing event) that wireshark was buggy and the code was actually broken by the "fix". I have now corrected this in m

Re: new error messages after upgrade 14.0-p5 to 14.1-p1 amd64

2024-06-27 Thread Rick Macklem
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 7:52 AM void wrote: > > After upgrading, I noticed messages like these appearing during > rebooting, immediately after kernel: NFS access cache time=60 > > kernel: rpc.umntall: 10.1.1.102: MOUNTPROG: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: > Timed out > > sometimes it appears twic

Re: new error messages after upgrade 14.0-p5 to 14.1-p1 amd64

2024-06-30 Thread Rick Macklem
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 5:23 AM void wrote: > > Hi Rick, > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 09:29:51AM -0700, Rick Macklem wrote: > > >rpcbind_enable="YES" > >nfs_client_enable="YES" > > > >If you have at least one of these in your /etc/rc.conf,

Re: new error messages after upgrade 14.0-p5 to 14.1-p1 amd64

2024-07-02 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 3:18 AM void wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 01:23:29PM +0100, void wrote: > > (snip) > > Just to add to this, the reported error does *not* occur on > 15.0-CURRENT #5 n270917-5dbf886104b4 arm64 > > and that system has *only* nfs_client_enable="YES" > > and it's a slower

Re: new error messages after upgrade 14.0-p5 to 14.1-p1 amd64

2024-07-11 Thread Rick Macklem
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 4:47 AM void wrote: > > Hi Rick, > > > >> > >> The nfs server is 14-stable and the exported dir is zfs with the sharenfs > >> property set. > >> The client (14.1-p1) is a VM on a different machine but the same network. > >> > >> I'll try putting rpcbind_enable=YES in /etc/

Re: Possible bug in zfs send or pipe implementation?

2024-07-13 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 7:02 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > > I'm migrating an old file server to new hardware using syncoid. Every > so often, the `zfs send` process gets stuck with the following > kstacks: > > 7960 108449 zfs - mi_switch > sleepq_catch_signals s

Re: Possible bug in zfs send or pipe implementation?

2024-07-13 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 8:19 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < > said: > > > # ps axHl > > should show you what wchan's the processes are waiting on and that might > > give you a clue w.r.t. what is happening? > > zfs is waiting to write into the pipe and pv (the progress meter) is > waiting in sel

Re: Possible bug in zfs send or pipe implementation?

2024-07-13 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 8:50 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 8:19 PM Garrett Wollman > wrote: > > > > < > > said: > > > > > # ps axHl > > > should show you what wchan's the processes are waiting on and that might >

Re: Possible bug in zfs send or pipe implementation?

2024-07-14 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:32 AM Garrett Wollman wrote: > < > said: > > > Just to clarify it, are you saying zfs is sleeping on "pipewr"? > > (There is also a msleep() for "pipbww" in pipe_write().) > > It is sleeping on pipewr, yes. > > [wollman@nfs-prod-11 ~]$ sysctl kern.ipc.pipekva > kern.ipc

NFS server credentials with cr_ngroups == 0

2024-10-14 Thread Rick Macklem
olce@ reported an issue where the credentials used for mapped user exports (for the NFS server) could have cr_ngroups == 0. At first I thought this was a mountd bug, but he pointed out the exports(5) manpage, which says: Note that user: should be used to distinguish a credential containing no grou

Re: NFSd not registering on 14.2.

2024-11-24 Thread Rick Macklem
he email, from what I've seen.) Good luck with it, rick > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 6:35 PM Rick Macklem wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 1:22 PM Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: >> > >> > >> > I've tried a lot of different combinations of r

Re: 14.1 NFS / mountd : -alldirs not working as expected

2024-11-21 Thread Rick Macklem
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 8:01 PM Michael Proto wrote: > > Hello all, > > Running into an issue with a 14.1 server that I think is a bug, though > it may be me not interpreting documentation correctly so I wanted to > ask here. =alldirs simply means that any directory within the server file system c

Re: 14.1 NFS / mountd : -alldirs not working as expected

2024-11-26 Thread Rick Macklem
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 3:57 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 2:55 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 8:01 PM Michael Proto wrote: > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > Running into an issue with a 14.1 s

Re: NFSd not registering on 14.2.

2024-11-25 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 2:17 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 9:16 PM Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > > > lo0 has 127.0.0.1, ::1 (both first in their lists). It also has a pile of > > other IPs that are used by jails. This has not changed > I just d

Re: 14.1 NFS / mountd : -alldirs not working as expected

2024-11-25 Thread Rick Macklem
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 2:55 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 8:01 PM Michael Proto wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > Running into an issue with a 14.1 server that I think is a bug, though > > it may be me not interpreting documentation c

Re: 14.1 NFS / mountd : -alldirs not working as expected

2024-11-25 Thread Rick Macklem
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 8:01 PM Michael Proto wrote: > > Hello all, > > Running into an issue with a 14.1 server that I think is a bug, though > it may be me not interpreting documentation correctly so I wanted to > ask here. > > Using NFSv3, with FreeBSD 14.1 as the NFS server. Based on what I se

Re: NFSd not registering on 14.2.

2024-11-21 Thread Rick Macklem
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 1:22 PM Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > > I've tried a lot of different combinations of rc variables. On 13.3 and > 14.1, nfsd in most (non-v4-only) configurations registers to rpcbind as > expected. This is true of restarting nfsd and using nfsd -r. > > However on 14.2, I

Re: 14.1 NFS / mountd : -alldirs not working as expected

2024-11-21 Thread Rick Macklem
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 1:56 PM Michael Proto wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 7:11 AM Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 8:01 PM Michael Proto wrote: > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > Running into an issue with a 14.1 s