On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 19:11, Mark E. Mallett wrote:>
> Second, it gives workaround of "vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync sysctl to 0"
> But on my 12.4 systems there is no such sysctl variable.
Oh, yes - the workaround is only applicable to 13.2 and later. For
12.4 there is no workaround.
Note that it
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 09:46:53AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
> Sometimes a security advisory or errata notice affects only the
> userland and doesn't cause the kernel version to be bumped. The "uname"
> output you're seeing is only the kernel version. If you want to see
> both kernel and userlan
On 2 Dec 2023, at 7:11 pm, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
> Might I also ask (or say):
>
[[...]]
> Third, it says the binary upgrade will result in 12.4-RELEASE-p8. When
> I do the freebsd-update, the result according to uname is
> 12.4-RELEASE-p6. Thinking that perhaps I have to do it again, I am told
On 03/12/2023 12:00, mike tancsa wrote:
Personally, I would not like the gmirror part as that adds a bit of
complexity I dont want. But it certainly would be nice for some users.
For now, I would vote against mounting the efi partition(s) by default
as that breaks device redundancy and would l
On 12/1/2023 6:57 PM, Pete French wrote:
On 01/12/2023 21:53, mike tancsa wrote:
Should have looked at open PRs. There is one from a while ago
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258987
Was thinking about this, and I was wondering if it would be possible
to make the EFI part
Resent. Not sure why, but this does not yet delivered.
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 22:57:12 -0700
Warner Losh wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:34 PM Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
>
> > It can be more straightforward to update the gmirror, however. I've done
> > this with UFS --- old boot, pair of UFS/GMI
Hi,
With all the improvements in 14-stable would it be nice to have a 14.1 release
in 3 to 6 months containing e.g. the latest openzfs 2.2.X?
I'm able to help if needed.
Regards,
Ronald.
