[SR-Users] Search all dialogs - Kamailiio 3.0.3

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone could offer any advice please. We are using the dialog module and need to be able to find out whether another dialog exists within a particular profile and having a specific value, so that we can send the new call to the same gateway. As far as I am aware,

Re: [SR-Users] Search all dialogs - Kamailiio 3.0.3

] Sent: 24 March 2012 12:08 To: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List Cc: Charles Chance Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Search all dialogs - Kamailiio 3.0.3 Hello, On 3/23/12 2:00 PM, Charles Chance wrote: Hi all, I was wondering if anyone could offer any

Re: [SR-Users] (no subject)

Hi Daniel, We have a couple of customers from whose email addresses we have received spam over the past few days and they are both Yahoo! mailboxes. Best, Charles Chance Managing Director t.  0121-285-44-00    m. 07932-063-891 www.sipcentric.com Follow us on twitter @sipcentric Sipcentric

Re: [SR-Users] dispatcher and call transfer

Hi, Actually, this won't help for attended transfers where another call is initiated first then the two are joined together by REFER. In this case, the second INVITE must be routed to the same media server as the existing call for the transfer to work. What we do is store the dialogs in DB, then

Re: [SR-Users] dispatcher and call transfer

6, 2012 at 14:30, Charles Chance wrote: Hi, Actually, this won't help for attended transfers where another call is initiated first then the two are joined together by REFER. In this case, the second INVITE must be routed to the same media server as the existing call for the transfer to work.

Re: [SR-Users] dispatcher and call transfer

nvite and increase performance if you have a large number of calls. Reda On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 15:52, Charles Chance wrote: Hi Reda, Sorry, I should have been more specific – I am referring to instances where the media server is for example Asterisk. If first call goes through Ast

[SR-Users] pua_dialoginfo - publish for caller or callee

Hi, Quick question relating to pua_dialoginfo (3.2) - is there a way to specify for which side (caller/callee) a PUBLISH is generated, or must it always be for both? Cheers, Charles ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - s

[SR-Users] (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo

Hi, Currently testing devel version and experiencing the following when using pua_dialoginfo: - Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 core_hash (t=0xb3d7e330, type=1024, ps=0xbfcc31c8) at ../../hashes.h:279 279

[SR-Users] FW: (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo

Hi Daniel, As per your previous reply (sorry, I deleted it accidentally), please find attached output of 'bt full' as requested. Best regards and thanks again, Charles _ From: Charles Chance [mailto:charles.cha...@sipcentric.com] Sent: 13 May 2012 11:21 To: &

Re: [SR-Users] FW: (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo

uris_caller)") modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "pubruri_callee_avp", "$avp(s:puburis_callee)") Cheers, Charles _ From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 May 2012 21:58 To: Charles Chance Cc: 'SIP Router - Kamailio (Ope

Re: [SR-Users] FW: (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo

to:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: 16 May 2012 08:15 To: Charles Chance Cc: 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -Users Mailing List' Subject: Re: FW: (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo Hello, hmm, hentity is null even a check for its value is done above

Re: [SR-Users] FW: (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo

Hi Daniel, I have sent the messages over to you. I look forward to hear what you can find. Best, Charles _ From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 May 2012 15:06 To: Charles Chance Cc: 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express R

Re: [SR-Users] Change the Server field on the SIP dialog

Hi, Have you tried setting server_header? See here for more info: http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/3.2.x/core#server_header Regards, Charles http://www.sipcentric.com From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip

Re: [SR-Users] Change the Server field on the SIP dialog

-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Charles Chance Sent: 18 May 2012 11:12 To: s...@kom-1.com; 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER)-Users Mailing List' Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Change the Server field on the SIP dialog Hi, Have you tried setting server_header

Re: [SR-Users] Using Sip-Router Logging & Register Problem Problem

Hi Faisal, You say you added to syslog.conf: local1.* -/var/log/kamailio Is that exactly how it appears? If so, I think you need to remove the hyphen so it becomes: local1.* /var/log/kamailio As Sammy said, don't forget to restart syslog. Regards, Charles -Original Message- From: Sam

Re: [SR-Users] FW: (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo

fault operation and provide more details. Cheers, Daniel On 5/17/12 6:58 PM, Charles Chance wrote: Hi Daniel,   I have sent the messages over to you.   I look forward to hear what you can find.   Best,   Charles   From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 May 2012 15:06 To

Re: [SR-Users] FW: (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo

dialog changes state. Can you re-compile with MEMDBG=1 (edit the Makefile.defs or give it in the command line parameter) and try again? Maybe the memory manager can catch the fault operation and provide more details. Cheers, Daniel On 5/17/12 6:58 PM, Charles Chance wrote: Hi Daniel,   I have

Re: [SR-Users] Add CallerID to SIP header

Hello Dominic, I think the UAC module should help you - http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/uac.html You should check first that your upstream provider allows you to pass caller ID - if not, they'll just replace/remove it anyway. Out of interest, what PBX do you have that does not

[SR-Users] Update existing module or create new?

All, We are working on a memcached module which uses the libmemcached library, as opposed to the (no longer under active development) libmemcache that the existing module depends on. Am I correct in thinking that in this instance, it would be better to create a brand new module (with a diffe

Re: [SR-Users] Update existing module or create new?

Hello Henning, On 05/02/2013 12:25, Henning Westerholt wrote: Am Dienstag, 5. Februar 2013, 12:52:19 schrieb Charles Chance: We are working on a memcached module which uses the libmemcached library, as opposed to the (no longer under active development) libmemcache that the existing module

[SR-Users] Path and DNS SRV

Hi All, Given a situation where there are multiple registrars, behind a single load balancer, sharing the same location table in DB, I understand that Path can be used to ensure everything works nicely with clients behind NAT. So, if UA1 is registered on P1, UA2 on P2, and UA1 calls UA2... P1 perf

Re: [SR-Users] Update existing module or create new?

Hi, On 06/02/2013 15:16, Henning Westerholt wrote: Am Dienstag, 5. Februar 2013, 13:55:41 schrieb Charles Chance: as the original author of the module I'd think that changing or replacing the existing module would be the way to go. So far I'd not recieved that much of bug reports a

Re: [SR-Users] Path and DNS SRV

Hi, Thanks for your reply. I did try that, but the path is still not stored in location table on save. I have "use_path" parameter of registrar module enabled. On 21 February 2013 23:17, Carsten Bock wrote: > Hi, > > you cannot use add_path(), but by creating your own Path header this > works

Re: [SR-Users] Path and DNS SRV

. > > regards > Klaus > > http://kamailio.org/docs/**modules/3.3.x/modules/** > textopsx.html#textopsx.msg_**apply_changes<http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.3.x/modules/textopsx.html#textopsx.msg_apply_changes> > > > > > On 22.02.2013 00:33, Charles Chance wrote

Re: [SR-Users] Update existing module or create new?

Hi Henning, On 22 February 2013 13:19, Henning Westerholt wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2013, 23:37:07 schrieb Charles Chance: > > [..] > > We now have an updated memcached module, working with libmemcached and > also > > with the added ability to (optionall

[SR-Users] Malformed PUBLISH from pua_dialoginfo (4.0.0)

Hi all, We are testing 4.0.0 in the lab and since upgrading, PUBLISHes generated by pua_dialoginfo appear to be malformed (content-length mismatch). Please see attached output from Wireshark for both the PUBLISH and the 400 response from Kamailio. PUBLISH is being sent from one Kamailio to anothe

Re: [SR-Users] Malformed PUBLISH from pua_dialoginfo (4.0.0)

Hi Daniel, It is from release (rpm). Thanks, Charles On 12 March 2013 13:18, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > is 4.0 from release of a bit older taken from the branch 4.0? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 3/12/13 2:04 PM, Charles Chance wrote: >

Re: [SR-Users] Malformed PUBLISH from pua_dialoginfo (4.0.0)

: > When did you download it? I had some builds done days before the release > just to test packaging is ok. Those ones after release were built last > evening and in this morning. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 3/12/13 2:25 PM, Charles Chance wrote: > > Hi Dan

Re: [SR-Users] Message Waiting

The script method works fine for us - but we use the externnotify option in voicemail.conf instead of scanning for changes at directory/database level. Regards, Charles On 12 March 2013 19:32, Daniel W. Graham wrote: > While I have seen other posts I have not found anything that describes my

Re: [SR-Users] Message Waiting

to scan > directory/database for changes? > > ** ** > > -Dan > > ** ** > > *From:* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto: > sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Charles Chance > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 12, 2013 3:42 PM > *T

Re: [SR-Users] Message Waiting

ind me asking what method you use > for generating the notifications, asterisk call file / sipsak / etc ? > > ** ** > > *From:* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto: > sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Charles Chance > *Sent:* Tuesday, M

Re: [SR-Users] Message Waiting

>From past experience you may need to add another entry to the dispatcher list with a different setid because no doubt sipsak is sending the notify from a different port to that which Asterisk is listening on. Eg. setid - 10, destination - sip::5065 Then - if(ds_is_from_list("10"))... Cheers, C

[SR-Users] Dialog module - shared state

Hi all, I was wondering, how are others sharing dialog module (particularly profile) state between multiple servers? Thanks in advance, Charles -- www.sipcentric.com Follow us on twitter @sipcentric Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 736

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module - shared state

2013 15:05, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > > On 3/26/13 1:51 PM, Charles Chance wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I was wondering, how are others sharing dialog module (particularly >> profile) state between multiple servers? >> > > if it i

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module - shared state

Thanks Daniel, that's what I'm thinking (dmq). I'll let you know how I get on! Cheers, Charles On Mar 26, 2013 4:40 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > Hello, > > On 3/26/13 5:30 PM, Charles Chance wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Yes,

[SR-Users] Fwd:

http://www.toyosoken.co.jp/ivtduw.php ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] Fwd:

Hi, Sincere apologies, not sure how this happened - please ignore, it was not me who sent it :/ Regards, Charles On 2 April 2013 08:21, Charles Chance wrote: > http://www.toyosoken.co.jp/ivtduw.php > > > ___ > SIP Express Router (SE

Re: [SR-Users] memcache problem - reporting protocol error

Hi Dragos, The memcached module has indeed been updated in the master to use libmemcached, as the old libmemcache library is no longer under active development. Have you tried using the latest version of the module from git? Do you still get the same errors? Cheers, Charles On 6 June 2013 16:1

Re: [SR-Users] memcache problem - reporting protocol error

Regards, Dragos -- *From:* Charles Chance *To:* Dragos Oancea ; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List *Sent:* Thursday, June 6, 2013 6:27 PM *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] memcache problem - reporting protocol error Hi Dragos, The memcached module has indee

Re: [SR-Users] memcache problem - reporting protocol error

er heavy development. > > Many thanks! > > Regards, > Dragos > > -- > *From:* Charles Chance > *To:* Dragos Oancea > *Cc:* SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - > Users Mailing List > *Sent:* Thursday, June 6

Re: [SR-Users] memcache problem - reporting protocol error

I mean just copying it in the kamailio-4.0.0 source tree, compiling it and > then putting it in the modules directory to be loaded at runtime. > > > Regards, > Dragos > > -- > *From:* Charles Chance > *To:* Dragos Oancea > *Cc:* SIP Router

Re: [SR-Users] How to cleanup unconfirmed dialog in memory?

Hi, I don't think this will help at all, as regardless of DB mode, unconfirmed dialogs are not stored in DB anyway. The important thing to remember is that if you are calling dialog_manage() in your config, to only do it once you are ready to forward the request. If you call it but then exit for

Re: [SR-Users] How to cleanup unconfirmed dialog in memory?

29207 ... Therefore, the unconfirmed dialogs never get cleared automatically, in my experience at least. I hope I'm wrong though :) Cheers, Charles On 2 July 2013 14:31, Henning Westerholt wrote: > Am Dienstag, 2. Juli 2013, 14:23:25 schrieb Charles Chance: > > I don't thi

Re: [SR-Users] How to cleanup unconfirmed dialog in memory?

when timeout is reached? On 2 July 2013 14:51, Carlos Ruiz Díaz wrote: > There is, but for all dialogs, not only the unconfirmed ones. > > > http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.3.x/modules_k/dialog.html#default-timeout-id > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Char

Re: [SR-Users] How to cleanup unconfirmed dialog in memory?

gt; parse the info and tear down those unconfirmed dialogs using dlg_end_dlg: > > http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/dialog.html#id2524783 > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Charles Chance < > charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote: > >> The paramet

Re: [SR-Users] How to cleanup unconfirmed dialog in memory?

Maybe patching the module is the only > solution. > > Regards, > Carlos > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Charles Chance < > charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote: > >> That doesn't work I'm afraid. Also from >> http://www.kamailio.org/

Re: [SR-Users] How to cleanup unconfirmed dialog in memory?

he SIP message was perfect fine with Bye signal, yet the > dialog is still hang with state 1. > > Gary > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Charles Chance < > charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Sounds perfect! I will tr

Re: [SR-Users] How to cleanup unconfirmed dialog in memory?

On 3 July 2013 17:25, Charles Chance wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Sounds perfect! I will try to test here tomorrow and let you know. > > Cheers, > > Charles > > > On 2 July 2013 22:44, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I pushed a patc

Re: [SR-Users] Asterisk cluster with Kamailio for load balancing.

Hello, Have you looked at http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb? Charles On 11 July 2013 16:01, Володимир Іванець wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Recently I became interested in concept of putting couple of Asterisks > servers in cluster. So I tried to repli

Re: [SR-Users] Asterisk cluster with Kamailio for load balancing.

to Kamailio, official tutorial did not cower all my > questions. > > Thanks. > > Regards, Volodya Ivanets. > > > 2013/7/11 Charles Chance > >> Hello, >> >> Have you looked at >> http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-

Re: [SR-Users] releasing v3.3.5

Hi Daniel, Sorry if I missed it already, but did the fix to clear early state dialogs get backported in the end? Cheers, Charles On 2 Aug 2013 09:17, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > Hello, > > I am considering to package soon a new version out of branch 3.3. If > anyone has spotted fixes

Re: [SR-Users] releasing v3.3.5

> not sure if would be just simple backport and then it might be better just > to upgrade to 4.0 instead of making 3.3 unstable. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 8/2/13 10:27 AM, Charles Chance wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > Sorry if I missed it already, but did the fix t

[SR-Users] DB_CLUSTER - Cluster Definition

Hi All, I'm having difficulties with the above module and can't see what I'm doing wrong. Config as follows: modparam("db_cluster", "connection", "db01=>mysql:// > readwrite:passw...@db01.domain.com/kamailio") > modparam("db_cluster", "connection", "db02=>mysql:// > readonly:passw...@db02.domain

Re: [SR-Users] Presence: Get number of active_watchers

Hi Jan, Why not use sqlops to query the database from within your config script? Best regards, Charles On 21 August 2013 13:36, Jan Gaida wrote: > Hello, > > I need to obtain the number of subscribed watchers for a given > presentity-uri. > > I can get it with a SQL Query like "select count

Re: [SR-Users] DB_CLUSTER - Cluster Definition

Hello, Is anyone able to confirm whether the cluster definition I provided should indeed do what I think it should? If so, I will take a look further myself to find the reason why not. Thanks in advance, Charles On 20 Aug 2013 16:18, "Charles Chance" wrote: > Hi All, &

[SR-Users] Nat_traversal module not sending keepalives

Hi all, Currently evaluating the nat_traversal module in some tests, and trying to configure keepalives for registers. We currently use nathelper, but due to the distributed nature of our setup, nat_traversal seems more appropriate for the keepalive functionality (nathelper is sending keepalives f

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio's XMPP issue

Hi, Not familiar with the specific module but it looks like a more general DNS issue - do you have the correct DNS server(s) configured in resolv.conf? Are you able to resolve other hostnames? Regards, Charles On 7 Sep 2013 11:56, "Nandini madhu" wrote: > Dear All, > > I am working on XMPP mod

Re: [SR-Users] Nat_traversal module not sending keepalives

ds, > Carsten > > 2013/9/9 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > > Hello, > > > > not using this module, however, after you start, can you see a dedicated > > timer module 'NT' if you do kamctl ps? > > > > Cheers, > > Daniel > > > > >

Re: [SR-Users] New Developer: Charles Chance

ello, >> >> I want to announce that a new person got developer GIT write access to >> repository: Charles Chance. >> >> He is for long time in the community, sending patches in the past to >> modules such as memcache. His immediate goal is to care of dmq module, &g

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio realtime fails to forward register with Asterisk.

Hi, Could be something network related, or firewall? I know you stated phones could register directly to Asterisk but if nothing is showing in Asterisk SIP log, then the requests are never getting to it. Was your trace performed on Kamailio server or Asterisk? Cheers, Charles On 13 September

Re: [SR-Users] issues with dispatcher rerouting to next server when getting a 500 from freeswitch

Hi, You describe what you are trying to achieve, but not the result you are seeing. One thing I noticed is that in your failure route you set t_on_failure("DISPATCH"), but should it not be t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH")? Regards, Charles On 14 Sep 2013 08:33, "Joseph Watson" wrote: > Hello Eve

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio realtime fails to forward register with Asterisk.

ue thats got me baffled. > > Regards > Mick > On 14 Sep 2013 09:08, "Charles Chance" > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Could be something network related, or firewall? I know you stated phones >> could register directly to Asterisk but if nothing is showing i

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio realtime fails to forward register with Asterisk.

Another thing, you do have bindport=5080 in your sip.conf, don't you? Regards, Charles On 14 September 2013 13:42, Charles Chance wrote: > Hi Mick, > > What is the output of the following commands on Asterisk machine? > > netstat -lnp | grep asterisk > iptables -L

Re: [SR-Users] Calling users on another kamailio server

Hi, This sounds like a case for sharing same database, and adding Path before saving incoming register. That way, no need to replicate register message to other servers and all subscribers use the same domain. Add path something like this before calling save(): append_hf(

Re: [SR-Users] Calling users on another kamailio server

istrar. > > Regards, > > Peter > > > On 16 September 2013 14:05, Charles Chance > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This sounds like a case for sharing same database, and adding Path before >> saving incoming register. That way, no need to replicate register

Re: [SR-Users] Calling users on another kamailio server

Hi Brian, Another tip, if you do share the same database, make sure the clocks are in sync ;) Cheers, Charles On 16 September 2013 14:22, Brian Wallen wrote: > Thanks for the tips guys. I'll try them out today and report back. > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:21 A

Re: [SR-Users] Calling users on another kamailio server

any reason it isn't possible? > > > On 16 September 2013 14:21, Charles Chance > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Yes, you are right - and I agree, it would be better if this was possible >> :) >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> On

Re: [SR-Users] Calling users on another kamailio server

is called, doesn't that mean >> the Path: header from add_path() would be added in that scenario? >> >> >> On 16 September 2013 14:49, Charles Chance > > wrote: >> >>> It is possible if the edge proxy and registrar are separate, as you say. >>&

Re: [SR-Users] Calling users on another kamailio server

ly_changes()) until the message left Kamailio too? >>> >>> If that is the case, and msg_apply_changes() is called, doesn't that >>> mean the Path: header from add_path() would be added in that scenario? >>> >>> >>> On 16 September 2013 14:49,

Re: [SR-Users] Calling users on another kamailio server

this way, when an INVITE reaches a proxy it'll do a lookup() and then > t_relay() to the appropriate registrar, right? > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Charles Chance < > charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote: > >> Peter - calling msg_apply_changes() after

Re: [SR-Users] Store dispatcher weight attribute in dispatcher table

Hi, Maybe priority? http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dispatcher.html#idp15199200 Regards, Charles On 18 September 2013 09:02, Grant Bagdasarian wrote: > Hello, > > ** ** > > Is it possible to store the weight attribute in the dispatcher table? If > so, which column must

Re: [SR-Users] Communicate with Kamailio through external application

Hi, Take a look at http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/xhttp_rpc.html, which allows you to receive/handle RPC commands over HTTP. Then use the appropriate RPC command in dispatcher module to reload table: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dispatcher.html#idp16998

Re: [SR-Users] Communicate with Kamailio through external application

s-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto: > sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Grant Bagdasarian > *Sent:* Friday, September 27, 2013 10:04 AM > *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Communicate with Kamailio through external > application**

Re: [SR-Users] Communicate with Kamailio through external application

vp(dsdst)") > > modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(dsgrp)")**** > > modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(dscnt)") > > modparam("dispatcher", "attrs_avp", "$avp(d

Re: [SR-Users] Communicate with Kamailio through external application

> Content-Type: text/html > > Server: kamailio (4.0.2 (x86_64/linux)) > > Content-Length: 2095 > > ** ** > > *From:* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto: > sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Charles Chance > *Sent:* Friday, Septembe

Re: [SR-Users] Communicate with Kamailio through external application

(): > handle_stream read: eof on /tmp/kamailio_ctl > > 8(11010) DEBUG: ctl [../../io_wait.h:617]: io_watch_del(): DBG: > io_watch_del (0x7f9211dab440, 11, -1, 0x10) fd_no=2 called > > ** ** > > *From:* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto: > sr-users-boun...

Re: [SR-Users] Communicate with Kamailio through external application

MI. It must match a URL to which the > RPC is bound. > > Is this referring to the binrpc modparam? > > ** ** > > Any tips? > > ** ** > > *From:* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto: > sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Charl

Re: [SR-Users] MSRP module - Ubuntu repo

Hi, Is the msrp module not included already in the core kamailio package? Regards, Charles On 24 Oct 2013 08:26, "Wingsravi R" wrote: > Dear Kamailio'ns, > > I have Installed kamailio V 4.0.3 from Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) repository > and running successfully. > now i have to work around MSRP r

Re: [SR-Users] MSRP module - Ubuntu repo

library. > Is that is enough ? with that i can load msrp module in kamailio.config > and continue ? > > or should i have to install kamailio from sources ? > > Thank you > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Charles Chance < > charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wro

Re: [SR-Users] MSRP module - Ubuntu repo

so, in this case also i need to > configure Rtp proxy or mediaproxy ? > if so, which proxy to use (either Rtpproxy or mediaproxy) with kamailio > server ? > > Regards, > Ravi > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Charles Chance < > charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wr

Re: [SR-Users] dialog sync via dmq

Hi, On 9 Dec 2013 07:45, "Victor V. Kustov" wrote: > > Hi all! > > Can I create dialog structures via dmq? > Not yet, but it is work in progress and will be possible soon. > for example, two K. share IP via carp. Active K. (carp master) process > calls, create dialogs and send it to slave. When

Re: [SR-Users] dialog sync via dmq

Hi, > In dialog module no functions to create/destroy dialogs, they described > and used in tm module. Do you plan move dialog creation/destroying > funcs in dialog module? I think it will more usable for replication: > use same functions for create dialog in tm module (when real sip > dispatch) a

Re: [SR-Users] Merry Christmas!

And to you, Daniel. Season's greetings to one and all! Cheers, Charles On 24 Dec 2013 20:28, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > Almost done with another fruitful year, counting two major releases, the > first edition of a dedicated conference for Kamailio and presence at over a > dozen event

Re: [SR-Users] Link Redundancy

Hello, Perhaps DNS SRV is what you are looking for? See http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRV_record for more info. Regards, Charles On 15 Jan 2014 22:52, "Owais ul Haq" wrote: > Hello, > > I have a kamailio server deployed along with an internet connection and > database (on a seperate server t

Re: [SR-Users] Replicate registration

Hi Volkan, You probably should take a look at the Path module. For UACs behind NAT, the INVITEs should be proxied via the server with which the client is registered. Best regards, Charles On 23 January 2014 21:41, Volkan Oransoy wrote: > First of all thank you for your replies. > > I think

Re: [SR-Users] dialog list query

John, What db_mode are you using for dialog module? Are the entries in the db if you check manually? Are you able to fetch other data using avp_db_query? And do you see any errors in the log? Regards, Charles On 1 Feb 2014 16:24, "John Murray" wrote: > Hello, > > > > I am managing calls with

Re: [SR-Users] dialog list query

Hi John, > > >What db_mode are you using for dialog module? > > Mode 5. I Don't need to persist the dialog state so means table maintained in memory and not flushed to disk until shutdown but I can access it through normal avp_db_query right? Do you mean mode 3? Anyway, avp_db_query is for readin

Re: [SR-Users] dialog list query

e case slightly, someone may be able to suggest another way to achieve it. Regards, Charles On 2 February 2014 15:40, John Murray wrote: > Charles, > > Thanks For that. > > How do I get the callid from a call in a specific profile if it is stored > in memory? > > Regards. &

Re: [SR-Users] DMQ question

Hi Alex, Yes, you are correct. It simply wraps the standard t_replicate() function, replicating the original request to every other node (first appending a new branch for each). Use case is essentially the same as the original but having the benefit of not having to define destination(s) staticall

Re: [SR-Users] DMQ question

he message has just been replicated by the primary server then it's safe to assume it's in service, right? Cheers, Charles On 3 March 2016 at 16:14, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 03/03/2016 11:09 AM, Charles Chance wrote: > > Yes, you are correct. It simply wraps the stand

Re: [SR-Users] DMQ question

hov wrote: > On 03/03/2016 11:29 AM, Charles Chance wrote: > >> In the first instance, you could use dmq_is_from_node() to determine if >> the message is a replicated one and if so, don't relay. >> >> There's no specific function to check the state of other no

Re: [SR-Users] DMQ question

Hi Alex, The function was primarily intended for onward replication of successful REGISTERs, rather than transactional state. Assuming the function was available for replies, how do you anticipate handling them on the standby node(s)? Cheers, Charles On 3 Mar 2016 17:33, "Alex Balashov" wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] DMQ question

s On 3 Mar 2016 7:00 pm, "Alex Balashov" wrote: > On 03/03/2016 01:58 PM, Charles Chance wrote: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> The function was primarily intended for onward replication of successful >> REGISTERs, rather than transactional state. >> >&g

Re: [SR-Users] using DMQ , Kamailio shutsdown

Hello, Which version are you running? Can you provide a gdb backtrace? Cheers, Charles Hello All, I am running two instances of kamailio and using dmq. Kamailio starts good. However one of the node shutsdown unexpectedly. Unsure what is going wrong. Please let me know what could be wrong. belo

Re: [SR-Users] using DMQ , Kamailio shutsdown

:03:14 P172 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[14013]: ALERT: > [main.c:739]: handle_sigs(): child process 14031 exited by a signal > 11 > > Mar 25 06:03:14 P172 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[14013]: ALERT: > [main.c:742]: handle_sigs(): core was generated > > Mar 25 06:03:14

Re: [SR-Users] Detecting calls with missing ACK (Lazy SIP scanners)

Hi, You should probably check out TM docs - specifically failure route ( http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_on_failure) and t_is_expired ( http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_is_expired). >From there you can do what you like. Cheers, Charle

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

Hello, I can take a look today. Cheers, Charles On 22 Sep 2016 06:20, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > Hello, > > I guess that the one who did the implementation of the srv query for dmq > hasn't "allocated" any service name. I haven't looked at the sources, but I > guess it should be a sma

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

? Cheers, Charles > Thank you for your great job. > > BR > José Seabra > > 2016-09-22 8:33 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance : > >> Hello, >> >> I can take a look today. >> >> Cheers, >> Charles >> >> On 22 Sep 2016 06:20, "Daniel

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

resolves to all IP addresses associated with the host. This includes > addresses from DNS SRV records, A and records. > > *Default value is “0”.* > > Thank you > Cheers > José > > > > 2016-09-22 13:28 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance : > >> Hey, >> >

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

Hi, On 22 September 2016 at 14:08, José Seabra wrote: > Hi charles, > Inline > Thanks > > 2016-09-22 13:51 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance : > >> Hi José, >> >> In your config, you need to tell DMQ about a minimum of one other node. >> This can be in the form

  1   2   >