Hello,
On 17.08.2011 11:46, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> On 8/11/11 10:12 AM, Timo Reimann wrote:
>> Hey Graham,
>>
>>
>> On 10.08.2011 14:27, Graham Wooden wrote:
>>> I would be interested in the 1.5 backported module. Is that available
>>> for the masses?
>> I personally wouldn't mind publ
On Wednesday 17 August 2011, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> [..]
> I would prefer no commit on the mainstream SVN branches, so we do not
> open past releases, that will create lot of confusion.
Hello,
I'd like to second this, especially as we're not planning to maintain this
special backport,
Hello,
On 8/11/11 10:12 AM, Timo Reimann wrote:
Hey Graham,
On 10.08.2011 14:27, Graham Wooden wrote:
I would be interested in the 1.5 backported module. Is that available
for the masses?
I personally wouldn't mind publishing the backport code. One interesting
question, however, is in what f
Hey Graham,
On 10.08.2011 14:27, Graham Wooden wrote:
> I would be interested in the 1.5 backported module. Is that available
> for the masses?
I personally wouldn't mind publishing the backport code. One interesting
question, however, is in what form to do that. Several approaches come
to my mi
Hello Daniel,
our solution is milisecond-based (signature: .).
But we can add a switch to support both solutions. Suggestion
#modparam("acc","cdr_time","milliseconds").
Bye Sven
Am 10.08.2011 14:24, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
Hi Timo,
related to another email I just sent to this m
Hi Timo,
I would be interested in the 1.5 backported module. Is that available for
the masses?
Thanks!
-graham
On 8/4/11 1:08 AM, "Timo Reimann" wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> as announced quite a while ago, I finally checked in code that allows to
> produce CDRs (Call Data Records) dire
Hi Timo,
related to another email I just sent to this mailing list, just to
double check for your enhancement, time related values (start, stop,
duration) in full CDRs are also second-based like in the classic acc
records?
Thanks,
Daniel
On 8/4/11 8:08 AM, Timo Reimann wrote:
Hi all,
as
