On 01.03.2012 00:44, Andreas Granig wrote:
On 02/29/2012 09:34 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Maybe you can catch the ACK before loose_route check with
if (ACK&& has_totag()&& uri=myself) {
# use load-balancer logic ...
}
This, and an rr-param to manually distinguish between hop-by-hop and
e
On 02/29/2012 09:34 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Maybe you can catch the ACK before loose_route check with
> if (ACK && has_totag() && uri=myself) {
> # use load-balancer logic ...
> }
This, and an rr-param to manually distinguish between hop-by-hop and
end-to-end messages in case the Route heade
Am 29.02.2012 19:12, schrieb Andreas Granig:
On 02/29/2012 06:35 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
If tm is used, it will take care of this by consuming the ACK and
generating a new one. It seems that we need some fixes for stateless
routing.
I already switched back to transaction stateful routing fo
On 02/29/2012 06:35 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
>> If tm is used, it will take care of this by consuming the ACK and
>> generating a new one. It seems that we need some fixes for stateless
>> routing.
>
> I already switched back to transaction stateful routing for now until I
> get a better idea abo
On 02/29/2012 06:23 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> That's really weird. It should not rewrite $ru. Maybe there is some
> special handling for ACK.
Yeah, I'm going to check the source.
> Anyway, if the Route header is consumed and pushed into $du it means
> that the "special behavior" which was done
On 29.02.2012 18:01, Andreas Granig wrote:
Hi Klaus,
On 02/29/2012 03:53 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
However if a 407 is relayed back from the registrar via the lb to the
UA, it sends an ACK, again with pre-loaded Route header like in the
initial INVITE, this time with to-tag. In that case, loo
On 02/29/2012 06:01 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
> Proxy is running on 192.168.51.133:5060, and client (linphone-3) sends a
> header "Route: " in the ACK after 407
> ++ before loose-route, $du='' - M=ACK R=sip:testuser3@192.168.51.133
> ++ after successful loose-route, $du='sip:192.168.51.133;lr' -
Hi Klaus,
On 02/29/2012 03:53 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> However if a 407 is relayed back from the registrar via the lb to the
>> UA, it sends an ACK, again with pre-loaded Route header like in the
>> initial INVITE, this time with to-tag. In that case, loose_route()
>> returns true, but the $du
On 29.02.2012 14:34, Andreas Granig wrote:
Hi,
I ran into an interesting scenario when experimenting with kamailio 3.1
as a stateless proxy (no tm module used):
There is an initial INVITE without to-tag and with pre-loaded Route
header pointing to the external address of the lb. When I call
l
