On 02/29/2012 06:23 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> That's really weird. It should not rewrite $ru. Maybe there is some
> special handling for ACK.

Yeah, I'm going to check the source.

> Anyway, if the Route header is consumed and pushed into $du it means
> that the "special behavior" which was done for the INVITE
> (loose-route==0) is not used here. IIRC these special behavior is only
> triggered if the request does not contain a to-tag.

Right, and this is explicitely stated in the docs.

> If tm is used, it will take care of this by consuming the ACK and
> generating a new one. It seems that we need some fixes for stateless
> routing.

I already switched back to transaction stateful routing for now until I
get a better idea about what's going on on my test machine.

Andreas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to