On 02/29/2012 06:23 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: > That's really weird. It should not rewrite $ru. Maybe there is some > special handling for ACK.
Yeah, I'm going to check the source. > Anyway, if the Route header is consumed and pushed into $du it means > that the "special behavior" which was done for the INVITE > (loose-route==0) is not used here. IIRC these special behavior is only > triggered if the request does not contain a to-tag. Right, and this is explicitely stated in the docs. > If tm is used, it will take care of this by consuming the ACK and > generating a new one. It seems that we need some fixes for stateless > routing. I already switched back to transaction stateful routing for now until I get a better idea about what's going on on my test machine. Andreas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users