Camila Troncoso writes:
>scripts are provided in lcr/utils directory that can be used to check
>the probabilities resulting from a given set of weight values. Same can
>be done with command 'kamctl eval_weights'.
>
> I really don't understand what is the probability finally assign to
Hi,
Here is a copy of part of README:
"
When the function load_gws() is called, matching gateways (that are not
currently designated as defunct) are ordered for forwarding purposes as
follows:
* (1) according to longest user part match
* (2) according to tuple's priority
*
Fabian Borot writes:
> 3 gws inside same group, and assuming the higher the weight the higher
> the capacity
>
> gw 1 with weight 20
> gw 2 with weight 30
> gw 3 with weight 60
>
> I would like to send more calls to gw 3, then gw 2 then gw 1
> but if when I do a load_gws, and I randomize the
thank you Juha, I understand the purpose and that is how I intend to use it,
[more weights for gws with more capacity]
but I guess I should have rephrase my question as: what is the purpose of the
"randomized" weight value then? when you randomize it then the weight parameter
becomes useless.
Fabian Borot writes:
> The help file for versions 3.1 and 3.2 also says "randomized weight",
> does it really work on those versions?
yes it does.
> or do you mean the "priority" column on the "lcr_rule_target" table
> instead?
yes.
> This may be a dumb question but since I don't get it I have
Thanks Juha, I figured that the avp reordering would be something like that.
The help file for versions 3.1 and 3.2 also says "randomized weight", does it
really work on those versions?
this is from 3.2
***
When the function load_gws() is called, matching gateways (that a
Ovidiu Sas writes:
> The awk version of the script is now integrated in kamctl.
thank you very much,
-- juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/
Hello Juha,
The awk version of the script is now integrated in kamctl.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> just to mention that kamctl base depends on awk, so this language can
>> be used in case something is easie
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> just to mention that kamctl base depends on awk, so this language can
> be used in case something is easier to do with it than pure shell.
i created awk version of lcr_weight_test script. i'm not using kamctl
myself, but if someone is and would like to call
just to mention that kamctl base depends on awk, so this language can
be used in case something is easier to do with it than pure shell.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 9/28/10 8:53 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Ovidiu Sas writes:
If the script can be provided in bash, then it would be nice to be
integrated i
Ovidiu Sas writes:
> If the script can be provided in bash, then it would be nice to be
> integrated in kamctl:
> - kamctl lcr weight_eval ...
ovidiu,
possibly it could be done, but i'm not that good in bash.
-- juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER)
If the script can be provided in bash, then it would be nice to be
integrated in kamctl:
- kamctl lcr weight_eval ...
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> you can create as well an utils or tools directory inside l
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> you can create as well an utils or tools directory inside lcr module
> folder, that will suggest direct relation with the module.
ok, juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
s
On 9/27/10 7:44 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
maybe there are other options, but here is what I did for dispatcher
weighted load balancing:
- each destination set has associated an array of 100 integers
- when destination set is loaded, this array is filled with in
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> maybe there are other options, but here is what I did for dispatcher
> weighted load balancing:
> - each destination set has associated an array of 100 integers
> - when destination set is loaded, this array is filled with indexes of
> destination addresses in
Hello,
On 9/24/10 9:43 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
[...]
any ideas on how to improve weighted random number calculation without
loosing performance?
maybe there are other options, but here is what I did for dispatcher
weighted load balancing:
- each destination set has associated an array of 10
of each gateway.
Thanks again,
Regards,
Ricardo.-
-Mensaje original-
De: Juha Heinanen [mailto:j...@tutpro.com]
Enviado el: domingo, 26 de septiembre de 2010 2:03
Para: Ricardo Martinez; us...@lists.kamailio.org
Asunto: Re: [SR-Users] LCR "weight" column question
ricardo,
i stu
ricardo,
i studied the weight problem a bit more and came to the conclusion that
implementing a fair weighting algorithm would be too complicated.
below is a script that can be used to find weight values matching
desired probabilities for lcr gateways. i don't know if it would be
appropriate to
Ricardo Martinez writes:
> As you can see there is no a 20,20,20,20,10,10 call repartition.
> Could this be a bug?
ricardo,
it is a "feature" of the way randomized weights are currently
calculated. if you have two wgs with weights 1 and 2 and then generate
two random numbers
1 * random number
Ricardo Martinez writes:
> I’m observing something like this : (these are “Simmultaneous calls”
> graphs)
ricardo,
my email client does not know to display your data, but weight is
assigned to gws like this:
matched_gws[gw_index].weight = t->weight * (rand() >> 8);
where t->weight comes from d
Hello Juha.
I’m observing something like this : (these are “Simmultaneous calls” graphs)
As you can see the GW05, Gw06, Gw09 and GW10 seems to share the load
equally, as expected.. but I was also expecting a little more load in the
GW02 ad Gw03.
They seems to me very underloaded (accordi
2010/9/22 Ricardo Martinez :
> If I have 100 calls, I was expecting was to have 20 to GW05, 20 to GW06, 20
> to GW09 and 20 to GW10
>
> Finalle 10 to GW02 and 10 to GW02.
>
> Is this the correct interpretation of this parameter?
Yes, but note you need to do much more that 100 calls in order the go
22 matches
Mail list logo
