Re: [SR-Users] continue processing route script if no response from gateway

2010-05-28 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Thursday 27 May 2010, JR Richardson wrote: > I read about append_branch() and added it to my failure route. Well, > that allowed the route to branch and forward the calls to the > failureroute gateways listed in the database. But now I have an issue > with re-transmits in the failure route, it

Re: [SR-Users] continue processing route script if no response from gateway

2010-05-27 Thread JR Richardson
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Uriel Rozenbaum wrote: > JR, > > Maybe for subsequent routes you'd like to use $oU (original URI Username) > that is the original number you intend to route. > > Rgds, > Uriel > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:23 PM, JR Richardson > wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 a

Re: [SR-Users] continue processing route script if no response from gateway

2010-05-27 Thread Uriel Rozenbaum
JR, Maybe for subsequent routes you'd like to use $oU (original URI Username) that is the original number you intend to route. Rgds, Uriel On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:23 PM, JR Richardson wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Henning Westerholt > wrote: > > On Thursday 27 May 2010, JR Richa

Re: [SR-Users] continue processing route script if no response from gateway

2010-05-27 Thread JR Richardson
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Henning Westerholt wrote: > On Thursday 27 May 2010, JR Richardson wrote: >> > i assume according your description that the GW in question don't send a >> > provisional response. Then the tm module should generate a internal 408 >> > after fr_timer interval which

Re: [SR-Users] continue processing route script if no response from gateway

2010-05-27 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Thursday 27 May 2010, JR Richardson wrote: > > i assume according your description that the GW in question don't send a > > provisional response. Then the tm module should generate a internal 408 > > after fr_timer interval which you could then catch in a failure_route. Do > > you armed the appr

Re: [SR-Users] continue processing route script if no response from gateway

2010-05-27 Thread JR Richardson
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Henning Westerholt wrote: > On Thursday 27 May 2010, JR Richardson wrote: >> I am lab testing carrierroute modue on kamailio 1.5.4-notls >> (i386/linux) and have a question on how to continue processing a call >> if kamailio sends a call with t_relay() but does not

Re: [SR-Users] continue processing route script if no response from gateway

2010-05-27 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Thursday 27 May 2010, JR Richardson wrote: > I am lab testing carrierroute modue on kamailio 1.5.4-notls > (i386/linux) and have a question on how to continue processing a call > if kamailio sends a call with t_relay() but does not get a response > from the gateway. > > I read about the timers

[SR-Users] continue processing route script if no response from gateway

2010-05-26 Thread JR Richardson
Hi All, I am lab testing carrierroute modue on kamailio 1.5.4-notls (i386/linux) and have a question on how to continue processing a call if kamailio sends a call with t_relay() but does not get a response from the gateway. I read about the timers in the tm module and set them pretty low in the c