On Thursday 27 May 2010, JR Richardson wrote: > > i assume according your description that the GW in question don't send a > > provisional response. Then the tm module should generate a internal 408 > > after fr_timer interval which you could then catch in a failure_route. Do > > you armed the appropriate failure_route in your cfg? > > Yes, the gateway is totally off-line so no response comes back. I do > have failure_route in the config. This is related to another active > post from me "Carrierroute failover domain not working" so I'm sure > this is a redundant post, but your input is appreciated. > > The pastebin has my kamailio.cfg, the kamailio debug trace and the > error received by sipp and the ngrep capture. > > http://pastebin.com/VQziKYjE
Hi JR, from the logs: INFO:carrierroute:cr_do_route: rewrite_uri_recursor doesn't complete, uri 65, carrier 1, domain 2 this means that there was an error during the invocation of the cr_route in the failure_route[2]. Can you check if you've a rule with domain 2 in your carrierroute table? And you probably also want to use revert_uri() and append_branch(); in the failure_route before respectivly after the new cr_route, otherwise you'll probably run in to problems as well. I just noticed that there is an error in the first example in the cr docs, i'll fix it now. The second example uses this two commands. Regards, Henning _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
