On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> Actually, it's the latter. Our current high availability setup reilies on
> anycast. And with TCP, this would mean a huge change in our setup.
>
> That is in fact an interesting topic. Can you please elaborate a bit more
> on this as I
On 27 Feb 2015, at 09:53, Sebastian Damm wrote:
> Actually, it's the latter. Our current high availability setup reilies on
> anycast. And with TCP, this would mean a huge change in our setup.
>
That is in fact an interesting topic. Can you please elaborate a bit more on
this as I would like
