On 27 Feb 2015, at 09:53, Sebastian Damm <d...@sipgate.de> wrote:
> Actually, it's the latter. Our current high availability setup reilies on
> anycast. And with TCP, this would mean a huge change in our setup.
>
That is in fact an interesting topic. Can you please elaborate a bit more on
this as I would like to see what we can
do in the software to make things easier.
I had a similar discussion a while ago and it seems like failover handling is
easier in UDP and we will need to fix this in order to be able to migrate more
users to TLS.
I haven't tested how different clients behave in regards of TCP if the server
close a connection.
/O
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
