Re: [SR-Users] problem with ser 0.9.6

2011-03-18 Thread Sabatella, Michael
(OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] problem with ser 0.9.6 Klaus Darilion writes: > It depends on which tables you are really using. E.g. subscriber, avpops > changed only minimal. If the provisioning system uses proper SQL > queries, then the a

Re: [SR-Users] problem with ser 0.9.6

2011-03-16 Thread Juha Heinanen
Klaus Darilion writes: > It depends on which tables you are really using. E.g. subscriber, avpops > changed only minimal. If the provisioning system uses proper SQL > queries, then the additional columns should cause much problems. IIRC > only LCR was heavily changed. and there is a script tha

Re: [SR-Users] problem with ser 0.9.6

2011-03-16 Thread Klaus Darilion
On 15.03.2011 16:51, Sabatella, Michael wrote: The problem with upgrading is we have a whole provisioning system built for ser and if upgrading changes the databse I would have to rewrite the whole front end to integrate the system and that could take me months.. It depends on which tables yo

Re: [SR-Users] problem with ser 0.9.6

2011-03-15 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Tuesday 15 March 2011, Sabatella, Michael wrote: > The problem with upgrading is we have a whole provisioning system built for > ser and if upgrading changes the databse I would have to rewrite the whole > front end to integrate the system and that could take me months.. > > Thanks for the resp

Re: [SR-Users] problem with ser 0.9.6

2011-03-15 Thread Sabatella, Michael
- Please consider the environment before printing this email. -Original Message- From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:henning.westerh...@1und1.de] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 11:39 AM To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Cc: Sabatella, Michael Subject: Re: [SR-Users] problem with ser

Re: [SR-Users] problem with ser 0.9.6

2011-03-15 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Tuesday 15 March 2011, Sabatella, Michael wrote: > I am a long time lurker but never posted. I am running ser 0.9.6 for many > years with no problems. Just recently none of my users can register. > Well – they register once then expire out.I noticed that several ser > processes are cpu- b

Re: [SR-Users] problem with ser 0.9.6

2011-03-15 Thread Sabatella, Michael
rg [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Sabatella, Michael Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 10:25 AM To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: [SR-Users] problem with ser 0.9.6 All, I am a long time lurker but never posted. I am running ser 0.9.6 for many years with no p

[SR-Users] problem with ser 0.9.6

2011-03-15 Thread Sabatella, Michael
All, I am a long time lurker but never posted. I am running ser 0.9.6 for many years with no problems. Just recently none of my users can register. Well - they register once then expire out.I noticed that several ser processes are cpu- bound consuming all available cycles. Once they dro

[SR-Users] Problem with ser

2011-02-03 Thread Asuncion Merino Rodriguez
Hello, i have insalled a ser server sucessfully. To try it, we was registered by a softphone, but when i am calling to the another registered user, he hang the phone but we cant ear anything. Can somebody help me? Thanks___ SIP Express Router (SER) and

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp->udp?

2010-10-11 Thread Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
On Oct 04, 2010 at 20:24, Simone Felici wrote: > Il 30/09/2010 19:47, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul ha scritto: > >On Sep 30, 2010 at 19:07, Simone Felici wrote: > > > > > > >I've just remember one more thing: try using consume_credentials() > > when proxy_authorize() (or radius_proxy_authorize) is s

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp->udp?

2010-10-04 Thread Simone Felici
Il 30/09/2010 19:47, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul ha scritto: On Sep 30, 2010 at 19:07, Simone Felici wrote: I've just remember one more thing: try using consume_credentials() when proxy_authorize() (or radius_proxy_authorize) is successful. This will remove the auth. info from the packets (mo

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp->udp?

2010-10-01 Thread Simone Felici
Thank you a lot for your answer! I'll try these modifications, starting from some tune on actual config of ser-2.0 to bring all working correctly and then ending with a test phase of the ser-3.0 version. I'll let you know if I should have some new issues. Thank you!!! Simon Il 30/09/2010 18

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp->udp?

2010-09-30 Thread Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
On Sep 30, 2010 at 19:07, Simone Felici wrote: > > Thank you a lot for your answer! > I'll try these modifications, starting from some tune on actual > config of ser-2.0 to bring all working correctly and then ending > with a test phase of the ser-3.0 version. > I'll let you know if I should have

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp->udp?

2010-09-30 Thread Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
On Sep 29, 2010 at 10:43, Simone Felici wrote: > > Hello to all! > > I need a little help with our ser installation (ser-2.0.0-rc1). > The continuous groving up of our infrastructure and using even more > codecs, causes the INVITE (udp) to be over 1500bytes. An > external->incoming call to our p

[SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp->udp?

2010-09-30 Thread Simone Felici
Hello to all! I need a little help with our ser installation (ser-2.0.0-rc1). The continuous groving up of our infrastructure and using even more codecs, causes the INVITE (udp) to be over 1500bytes. An external->incoming call to our proxy sip comes in with a size of ~1300 and will be forwarded

[SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp->udp?

2010-09-30 Thread Simone Felici
Hello to all! I need a little help with our ser installation (ser-2.0.0-rc1). The continuous groving up of our infrastructure and using even more codecs, causes the INVITE (udp) to be over 1500bytes. An external->incoming call to our proxy sip comes in with a size of ~1300 and will be forwarded