On 25 Feb 2015, at 18:56, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 18:14:06 Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> Thank you for the feedback!
>
> BTW the Yes to is this a good thing ment: this is a really good idea to have
> in writing. But you still have to rely on the bugfinders to realize t
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 18:14:06 Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback!
BTW the Yes to is this a good thing ment: this is a really good idea to have
in writing. But you still have to rely on the bugfinders to realize the
impact/need to secrecy.
> > But I fail to see how a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/25/2015 12:14 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>
> On 25 Feb 2015, at 17:24, Daniel Tryba wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 16:14:43 Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>>> http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/securitypolicy
>>>
>>>
>>> We encourage your fee
On 25 Feb 2015, at 17:24, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 16:14:43 Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/securitypolicy
>>
>>
>> We encourage your feedback!
>>
>> - Is this a good thing for the project?
>
> Yes
>
>> - Do you have any changes to the pol
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 16:14:43 Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/securitypolicy
>
>
> We encourage your feedback!
>
> - Is this a good thing for the project?
Yes
> - Do you have any changes to the policy to suggest?
Yes:
>secur...@kamailio.org
>This address sho
Hello Kamailians!
During our last developer meeting, we had a discussion about implementing a
security policy for the project. I drafted a proposal that seemed fine with the
developer team. At this point, I'm looking for your feedback.
The proposal is short and brief at this point, we'll learn
