On 25 Feb 2015, at 18:56, Daniel Tryba <d.tr...@pocos.nl> wrote: > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 18:14:06 Olle E. Johansson wrote: >> Thank you for the feedback! > > BTW the Yes to is this a good thing ment: this is a really good idea to have > in writing. But you still have to rely on the bugfinders to realize the > impact/need to secrecy. +1000 - this was discussed during the dev meeting.
> >>> But I fail to see how a pgp key for security is really important. Is >>> there a PKI for kamailio releases? >>> http://www.kamailio.org/pub/kamailio/latest/src/ contains the latest >>> version, but there is no way to verify if this is really the latest >>> release. No ssl, no dnssec, no signed checksums. These should be >>> considered also. >> >> I would love seeing signatures > > This needs some release management, this needs to be discussed with Daniel(- > Constantin) as manager of the project and with the builders of packages. Agree fully. It's currently out of scope for this document. /O
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
