The mailman list manager filtered the initial message in bounce list
with the reason:
" The message headers matched a filter rule"
No time to dig in more to discover the reason why it did it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19/05/16 18:48, Pejman Rajabian wrote:
>
> Is there is reason why this post does not
I am having a dilemma with manipulation of the light status when multiple
calls land on the same extension.
Let's say a call is in progress on extension 107 and Kamailio has already
sent notifies to all subscribers who watch the status of extension 107 and
they all have a red light for the blf but
Is there is reason why this post does not get approved?
From: Pejman Rajabian [mailto:pej...@italkip.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 12:59 PM
To: 'sr-users@lists.sip-router.org'
Subject: Kamailio notify conflict when a second call lands on a phone
I am having a dilemma with manipula
Yea, yea, I got that dialog do not have offline and online status. You
mean, that there is no way to tell phone, that extension is offline,
even if it is offline by Kamailio no chance to pass this info to phone
unless it's subscribed for presence event, right?
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:34 +0100,
Am 11.02.2011 07:57, schrieb Spinov Evgeniy:
> Thank you for detailed explanation, now I've got it, but I'm confused
> about workaround. Really nothing could be done to send phone offline or
> get it online when it's off? For instance to get it online, it's
> possible to emulate false call, with
Thank you for detailed explanation, now I've got it, but I'm confused
about workaround. Really nothing could be done to send phone offline or
get it online when it's off? For instance to get it online, it's
possible to emulate false call, with INVITE, for instance.
Have you tried something like th
Spinov Evgeniy wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 16:24 +0100, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Thank you for the links, especially this one
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/pua_dialoginfo.html#id2887055
I've missed this section while read README. I've fixed that out and made
it working for
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 16:24 +0100, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Thank you for the links, especially this one
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/pua_dialoginfo.html#id2887055
I've missed this section while read README. I've fixed that out and made
it working for INVITE requests. I.e. wh
Am 09.02.2011 14:56, schrieb Spinov Evgeniy:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:47 +0100, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> Do you see PUBLISH requests with Event: dialog?
>>
>> Note: those will be sent by pua_dialoginfo module to Kamailio itslef,
>> thus will be sent on the loopback interface. You should see the
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:47 +0100, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Do you see PUBLISH requests with Event: dialog?
>
> Note: those will be sent by pua_dialoginfo module to Kamailio itslef,
> thus will be sent on the loopback interface. You should see them with
> "ngrep -d any port 5060"
>
> klaus
No, PU
Do you see PUBLISH requests with Event: dialog?
Note: those will be sent by pua_dialoginfo module to Kamailio itslef,
thus will be sent on the loopback interface. You should see them with
"ngrep -d any port 5060"
klaus
Am 09.02.2011 14:16, schrieb Spinov Evgeniy:
> Hello all.
>
> I'm having pro
Hello all.
I'm having problem with sending NOTIFY packet for event dialog.
The problem is, that all NOTIFY packets sent with this event is empty.
( Content-length: 0 ) and in fact, not passing actual status to the
phone. In my case this is SPA962.
NOTIFY packets for event presence are sent fine
12 matches
Mail list logo
