are accessing the very same database? Please consider that in
a MySQL cluster only one client at time has permission to write the same record.
Cheers!
Moacir
From: chabert.loic...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 09:45:15 +0200
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability
ilio writing in
> the database and a second "live" Kamailio using the same database but not
> receiving any connection/request. Would this jeopardize the way Kamailio
> works?
>
> Cheers,
> Moacir
>
> --
> To: sr-users@lists.sip-r
Cheers,
Moacir
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
From: mico...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:01:23 +0200
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability
Just to mention that ucarp can be a very basic alternative to
corosync/pacemaker to manage the virtual ip. A simple app, b
to this new Kamailio instance
>> would be enough to allow it find the called party?
>>
>> Anyway, can you guys comment on my "thoughts"? Is it possible? Am I
>> missing something? Would you suggest another approach for such scenario?
>>
>> Cheers!
>
Hello,
a bit curious about this one ...
Are you in control at low level of the infrastructure (e.g., leased
pipes between data centers)? I expect that is needed to change the
routes for IP addresses in real time ...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/06/16 21:07, Loic Chabert wrote:
>
> Hello Bill,
>
> I ha
+1 for corosync/pacemaker with drbd or a flavor of master/master replication
-dan
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Fred
Posner
Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2016 8:22 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability
If it&#
I thank you all for the feedback.
Now it is time to pick one or two given advices and do some testing.
Cheers!
Moacir
From: gr.sab...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 12:38:23 +0430
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability
For Kamailio high availability you
sage -
>
> *From:* Moacir Ferreira
> *To:* Kamailio Mail List
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 05, 2016 10:26 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] High availability
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry... I should have mentioned before. You guys are thinking on the
> standard Internet SIP calls&#
- Original Message -
From: Moacir Ferreira
To: Kamailio Mail List
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability
Hi,
Sorry... I should have mentioned before. You guys are thinking on the
standard Internet SIP calls' behavior while I am t
Fred Posner writes:
> If it's just 2 servers, consider as Juha said, corosync/pacemaker with
> drbd.
Yes, and if you prefer to use mysql master-master replication instead of
drbd, you can still use corosync/pacemaker for active/passive kamailio
sip proxy that share the same virtual ip address. U
called party?
>
> Anyway, can you guys comment on my "thoughts"? Is it possible? Am I
> missing something? Would you suggest another approach for such scenario?
>
> Cheers!
> Moacir
>
> --
> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:07:41 +0200
> From:
> Anyway, can you guys comment on my "thoughts"? Is it possible? Am I missing
> something? Would you suggest another approach for such scenario?
>
> Cheers!
> Moacir
>
> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:07:41 +0200
> From: chabert.loic...@gmail.com
> To: sr-users@li
sible? Am I missing
something? Would you suggest another approach for such scenario?
Cheers!
Moacir
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:07:41 +0200
From: chabert.loic...@gmail.com
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability
Hello Bill,
I have made kamailio ha using exabgp w
Hello Bill,
I have made kamailio ha using exabgp with loopbacks.
Check https://github.com/Exa-Networks/exabgp
With bgp, kamailio cluster can be splited on severals datacenters.
Regards.
Le 5 juin 2016 20:53, "Bill" a écrit :
> Hi Moacir
>
> We have only found three ways to handle failover.
>
Hi Moacir
We have only found three ways to handle failover.
1. Change the DNS entry whenever a failure is detected.
2. Use SRV records to display an alternate route.
3. Use the failover mechanism in the phone itself
1. works, but it may take some time for your ua's to become aware of the
change
Hi Moacir
We have only found three ways to handle failover.
1. Change the DNS entry whenever a failure is detected.
2. Use SRV records to display an alternate route.
3. Use the failover mechanism in the phone itself
1. works, but it may take some time for your ua's to become aware of the
change
Alberto Sagredo writes:
> 1.- Take a look to keepalived.org
Another possibility is to use corosync/pacemaker. I think someone wrote
a tutorial about it.
-- Juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@list
HI Moacir
1.- Take a look to keepalived.org
2.- LCR Module or dispatcher could do what you look for
Best Regards
2016-06-05 16:41 GMT+02:00 Moacir Ferreira :
> Hi,
>
> I got two questions regarding high availability:
>
> 1 - Should my Kamailio server fail, I would like another Kamailio
> "box/
Hi,
I got two questions regarding high availability:
1 - Should my Kamailio server fail, I would like another Kamailio "box/server"
to take over with minimum services disruption. What is the "community" advice
for such environment?
2 - Should my main PSTN gateway fail, what would be the best m
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Moacir Ferreira
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 2:36 PM
To: Kamailio Mail List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability
The limitation is when the client phone is not srv aware. But anyway, for sure
this would be the best solution. So, if I
srv record? Just
by having access to the same SQL database will server B be able to call
(locate) a client that was registered initially on server A? Thanks,
MoacirFrom: davy.van.de.mo...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:34:58 +0100
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-U
Use multiple kamailio's, access them over sip-srv (that will give you high
availability) , and checkout cassandra if you need db-connectivity ;)
That should be imho the simplest and oh boy efficient :)
On 12 Mar 2013, at 10:29, Moacir Ferreira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What would be the community's a
Hi, What would be the community's architecture advice for deploying Kamailio in
a high availability environment? I am looking for something simple, still
efficient. Thanks,
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kama
Infact if kamailio goes down heartbeat restarts it again !! how do I stop
heartbeat doing it and let the other node take over the resource!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:05 PM, SamyGo wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Some progress.. I have configured heartbeat and with the crm option to set
> kamailio as res
Hi again,
Some progress.. I have configured heartbeat and with the crm option to set
kamailio as resource i.e
crm(test-conf)configure# *primitive Kamailio lsb::kamailio op monitor
interval=15s*
I can see that if I put the primary node on standby the kamailio instance
starts on secondary node ! b
OK thanks,
I'm trying this all for myself. once I try this, test this, and get
something done I will post the tutorial for all.* I may need help in this.*
Regards,
Sammy
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> SamyGo writes:
>
> > Really appreciate that. Would you please like to
SamyGo writes:
> Really appreciate that. Would you please like to contribute the whole
> procedure so that everyone knows whats happening here !!
i'm not able write a tutorial on how to setup and use
heartbeat/pacemaker. virtual-ip and sip-proxy could be configured
something like this (i haven't
Thanks Juha :)
Really appreciate that. Would you please like to contribute the whole
procedure so that everyone knows whats happening here !!
As soon as I finish with this one *successfully* I will write about it in
my blog, so anything that leads to its successful implementation
would benefit alo
SamyGo writes:
> Thats just my suggestion, I am trying to setup a clustered service and
> still no luck. Only heartbeat works which is pretty basic, anything on top
> of heartbeat to make it application level redundant (active/passive OR
> active/active) like OCF resources and their documentation
Sir ,
I always do a thorough searching through the user's mailing list here., and
I know I still find it difficult thinking about creating a cluster of
Kamailio servers.
If only there could be basic instructions and specially role of new version
modules(may be *dmq*) to create a telco-grade impleme
Hello,
the wiki is open for everyone to contribute:
* http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/
You need to make yourself an account, the anonymous posting based on
CAPTCHA was disabled due to spam bots easily breaking CAPTCHA system and
posting spam.
If someone takes the time to search a bit through
Hi,
I personally think that there needs to be an official wiki page giving
details about a basic redundant/HA server setup. A lot of people need this
on regular basis. So I request forum members and contributors to share
their guidelines on this.
Thanks,
Sammy Go.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:32 PM
Hi Carel,
this is a rather complex question with no simple yes or no answer.
You can use the dialog module with no "in-memory" storage of dialog
data and leave it to the database to do the replication. I think
postgres has Multi-Master Replication, i am not sure about MySQL.
At a major german telc
Dear all, hope to get some information from you guys!
For a redundant service we have to build up SIP proxy/registrar server in a
high available scenario. Therefore, we will have 2 SIP proxy/registrar on two
completely independent servers. They should be SIP dialog stateful and
replicate all th
Yeah, I'm using OpenSIPS.
I've be searching for this exhaustively for the last week in all OpenSIPS
docs and development lists I could find in the OpenSIPS website and on the
Internet, and also a bunch of HA projects related to SIP servers in general
(not related to OpenSIPS or Kamailio) which poi
Err Are You sure You send this message to the right list?
I don't know about OpenSIPS Dialog module, but am almost sure there are
diferences with KAMAILIO module... please check the documentation for
KAMAILIO Dialog module in
http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_k
Hi guys! I'm facing some problems with dialog information while trying to
implement a HA environment.
We have 2 clustered SIP servers working as a Active/Standby failover and
the use of a Virtual IP address. We want to make sure that if proxy #1 goes
down during a call, proxy #2 would be able to ha
37 matches
Mail list logo
